Laserfiche WebLink
Rjihn slated ilic applicnnis could submil n re-RradinB and restoration plan and that they probably do not <br />need to restore it back to the original grade. <br />Frii/.ler in(juire«l wbeibcr it would be necessary for the applicant to appear before the Planning <br />Commission again if Stall's recommendations are approved. <br />Cinffron staled in his opinion the City Engineer could review the re-grading and restoration plan and that <br />it may not be necessary for the Planning Commission to review the plan unless they so desire. <br />Chair Kahn asked for public comment. <br />Jeff Danbury, 4410 Shoreline Drive, Spring Park, inquired whether the botddcr wall looks worse than a <br />wooden set of steps down the slope. Danbury noted they would constitute the same amount of <br />hardcover. Danbury inquired whether a portion of the boulder wall could remain along with the grass <br />ramp. <br />Kahn noted the applicant is not limited to consirucliiig a wooden stairway and that there are other types <br />of materials that could he used. <br />(MOS-3074 Sean and Mcliua Wambold, Continued) <br />Marot/ slated if some grading is to occur, it could be graded in such a way that a portion of the wall <br />could be retained. <br />Rahn slated in his view one of the issues is the visual impact from the lake and that typically all that is <br />seen from the lake arc boulders. Rahn stated the City Hnginecr has determined that the boulder wall is <br />not necessary and that the applicants arc not rerpiired to have ji stairway down to the lake. <br />Leslie noted the .stairway being discu.sscd by the Planning Commission and the C.'ity engineer would be <br />allowed in the 0-75* /one anil not in the area where the ramp is being propo.sed. <br />Wombold commented if the objective is to reduce the hardcov er below 168 square feet of hardcover <br />within the 0-7S* /one, leaving a |H)i1ioii of the boulder wall and having a lamp would be Ivetter than <br />conslrucling stairs. <br />Rahn stated if the .stairs aie not necessary at all, then the Planning Commission would prefer no stairs. <br />Pritzlcr commented in his view this slope may not need a stairway. <br />Maiot/. noted the City l•ngincer did recommend that stairs be allowed on this property due to the slope. <br />Wainhold stated they would rather have a ramp than stairs. Wambold asked if they are able to reduce <br />the hardcover to below 168 sipiare feel, whether they would be permitted to leave a portion of the <br />hoiildei wall. <br />Rahn inipiired where the 168 sipiare feel figure comes Imm.