My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:51:41 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:25:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on February 22, 2005 and recommended approval of a front yard <br />setback variance to allow u setback of 77 feet based on the following <br />findings: <br />a. 'Hie existing house, which has a setback of 77’, was constructed prior <br />to adoption of the current setback requirement of 100’. <br />b. Approval of the front yard setback request of 72’ wouid not be <br />consistent with past approvals on lots with similar conditions. <br />c. Approval of a front yard setback variance of 77’ will not increase the <br />current non-conforming setback of 77’. <br />d. The request to increase the number of attached garage stalls from the <br />existing single stall is a reasonable request based on the current <br />construction trends. <br />Tlie City Council has considered tliis application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other properly in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br />conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br />property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br />Flan of the City. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby <br />grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-395 (B) to allow <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.