Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />A|)|)ttralion SubmiKcfl: Dcrciiibcr 22, 20<M <br />liicoiiipictc LcKcr: Jamtary 4,2005 <br />Appllcalloii Complete: January 10, 2005 <br />60-Day Rcviciv Expiration (Site Han): March 11,2005 <br />120 Day Review Expiration (Subdivision): May 20, 2005 <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Chnir Ralm & Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, Cily Adminislralor <br />Mike Gafl'ron, Plamiing Dirccior^j^|^^ <br />January 13,200S <br />«05-308 1 “Sloncbay LoHs ” - Oiillot 12, S TONliHAY (“2670 Kelley Parkway”) <br />- Public, Hearing: <br />1) RPUD Amcrulmcnt / Site Plan & Building Plan Approval <br />2) Final Plal Approval <br />Summary of Request New appl iean ts recpiesl an amendment o f tlic Stonebay RPUD for changes to <br />theowner-oeeupic(la)n(lominium(“Ijofls ”)biiil(iingaiul site plan, requesting final site plan and building <br />plan approvals us well as final plat approval fur Outlet 12 as a single 2.S acre lot fur the cunduminiuni <br />building. With a new builder and a new architect, this new proposal is similar to the single 3-stoi7 <br />building proposal PlaiuiingConmiission reviewed last October. Thesubmilted plans identify 61 units <br />rather than the 62 units originally approved. <br />Property Owner: /,!) Constiuction, Inu. - Arnic Zaclimun (purchuse agrecinent with John 'ferraiice <br />1 Ionics I.LC) <br />Plaiuier/F.ngiiicer: Dmdfunn <br />Architect: Urucc Lehrer <br />Staff Recomiiieiidatioii: <br />Planning Commission should review the list of potential issues and detennine whether tlicse and/or <br />additional issues require diseiission. An option is to review this site plan further at your I'cbniary 2 work <br />session. Key to your review is to detennine whether the niajoi revisions are acccjitable, es|)ccially the <br />conversion fioin two buildings to one building . <br />IfPlanning(!ommi.ssionconclu(l(vithat the propo.sed revisions are accej)tabIc,tlicnarcconuncndation <br />Ibr approval would be in order. If Planning Commission concludes that one or more of the topics <br />identified in this memo requires further consideration, then tabling would be appropriate.