Laserfiche WebLink
Appliralion SuliniKteit; December 22,2004 <br />Incomplrtr I^ilcr: January 4,2005 <br />Application Coiiiptcte; January 10,2005 <br />60-Day Kcvictv Eipiraiiun (Site Plan ); March II, 2005 <br />120 Day Review Expiralioii (Subdivision); May 20,2005 <br />B <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />CliJiir Ri'ihu & Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Mooise, City Administrator <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning Hiiector^^^^^. <br />January 28, 2005 <br />//05-3081 “Stonebay LoAs ” - Oiillot F, STONFMAY (“2670 Kelley Parkway") <br />- Public Hearing: Continuation; Review revised site and building plans <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised Plans (4 Sheets) - Full si/e and 11x17 <br />B - Memo and Selected Fxhibits of 1-13-05 <br />r <br />The applicant has revised the proposed building by reducing it from 62 units to 57 units, by eliminating <br />the west 48'. 1 his provides for a much shorter building frontage, and leaves a gieater setliack to Public <br />Works, which staff feels is a plus. <br />Required parking reduces to 112 stalls (excluding the guest unit), of which 82 arc provided in the <br />underground parking. 23 are in the outside dedicated parking lot, and 7 arc in the adjacent street <br />parallel parking, for a total of 112 stalls. <br />The grading plan may need some additional refinement, and the Fire Marshal is reviewing the need for <br />access doors, additional sidewalks, etc. However, in general, the revised plans appear to be <br />responsive to many of the concerns noted by the Planning Commission on January 18. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Planning Commi.ssion should review the site plan to identify any specific concerns you believe need to <br />be addressed with the site plan. As a minimum. Planning Commission should address the following; <br />1. Acceptaliihty of building design, materials, length, height, etc. <br />2. Signage, building lighting. <br />3. Acceptability of laiui.scapc plan. <br />4. Any other issues of interest or concern. <br />.Staff Recommendation <br />If Planning Commission concludes that the proposed site plan and building plans are acceptable, then a <br />lecomiiiendation for approval would be in order, subject to any conditions you feel arc appropriate. If <br />Planning Commission concludes that one or more of the above topics lequircs further consideration. <br />then tabling may be appio|)iiate. Provide the applicant with clear direction rei-,aidmg any chances you <br />coiic Iik Ic arc nccessaiy.