My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />0050079 <br />Janimry Itt, 2005 <br />PaRC 2 of 4 <br />lixhibit D - Proposed Plan <br />Bxhibit E - Hardcover Calculations <br />P.xhibit F - Removal Plan <br />Exhibit G - Proposed Elevations <br />Itxhibil H - Photographs <br />Exhibit I Adjacent Property Owners ’ Acknowledgement h ’onns <br />F>xhibit J - Property Owners f.ist <br />Exhibit K - Plat Map <br />Background <br />The applicant met with the City’s Building Official several months ago to discuss this <br />project. Planning Department staff was briefly brought into this meeting, however never <br />had a clear view of what was being proposed. The applicant submitted this application <br />on the deadline day without a pre-application incetitig. Staff has since worked with the <br />applicant to understand what exactly is proposed and what variances arc necessary. <br />The applicant received a variance in February, 2001 that pennitted hardcover and grading <br />within 75 ’ of the lake for constmetion and repair of various retaining walls. That request <br />permitted 3,258 s.f. of hardcover when 0 is allowed, 'fhat number varies by 55 s.f. from <br />the cxivSting hardcover level of 3,203 s.f. that was submitted with this request. StalThas <br />detennined that the 0-75 ’ hardcover calcidation submitted with this request should be <br />ujicd in detennining what should be approved. This is because the 3,258 s.f. allowance <br />was based on the need for retaining wall repair and construction. If 3,258 s.f. was not <br />needed for retaining walls, a deck shoiddn ’t be allowed to make up the 55 s.f. dilTcrencc. <br />I OT ANAI.YSIS WORSlIRRT <br />l.ot Area/Width <br />LR-IA l.ot Area Lot Width <br />Required <br />87,120 s.f. (2.0acrc.s)2(K)’ <br />Actual 57,053 s.f. (1.3 acres)428 ’ @ Shoreline; 294 ’ @ <br />75 ’ Setback <br />Setbacks <br />1<Kequired Kxisting Proposed <br />P'ront N/A N/A N/A <br />Rear (street)50 ’117 ’No ("liangc <br />Left Side 30*05 ’No C^hangc <br />Right Side N/A N/A N/A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.