Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #05 3072 <br />3 January 2005 <br />Pago 4 of 5 <br />Additionally, Section 78-916 states that a conditional use pcmiit may be revocable, may <br />be granted for a limited time, or may be granted subject to such conditions as lire council <br />may prescribe; and a conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the <br />conditions agreed upon arc observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city <br />from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of comlitional uses; and <br />a certified copy of any conditional use permit shall be filed with the county recorder or <br />registrar of titles. The conditional use pennit .shall include the legal dc.scription of the <br />properly included. <br />Sign Size Variance <br />The Orono sign ordinance docs not address the needs of institutional uses within <br />residential /ones. Currently the school has a campus sign perpendicular to Highway 12 <br />in front of the tennis courts. The existing sign is approximately 41 s.f. total area and <br />contains a manual readerboard. <br />'fhe applicant has proposed a moiuimcnl sign ap|)roximately 9’ high and 11* wide. The <br />proposed sign meets City Code Section 78-1466(11) regarding monument signs, fhe <br />proposed sign copy area 56 s.f. with a 30 s.f static elec‘ro'!ic readerboard. The applicant <br />has indicated that this readerboard is to be changed no more frequently than once daily <br />and its purpose is to provide parents and students with relevant school infomiation. The <br />electronic readerboard will eliminate the need for sending a student or staff member out <br />to the sign to physically change the message on the sign and will be more functional for <br />the school. As proposed the static electronic readerboard is not considered a “Hashing <br />illuminated sign" which is not allowed. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation I'crm attached as Hxhibit U, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analy.sis <br />/« considerinn applications for variance, the Hanninp Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the pnhlic safety, and the effect on values of property in <br />the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of circumstances nniifne to the individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds that often the needs of the institutional uses within the lesidcntial districts arc <br />not met under the cunent sign regulations. Variances have been consistently granted for <br />the dif ferent sign needs for the varying institutional u.ses within the (hty of Orono in the <br />past, and perhaps this is indicative of the need to update the codes with respect to <br />institutional uses '.vithin residential /ones.