Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF TIIK <br />OKONO Cl IV C:OI)NCIL MEETING <br />Mondiiy, Deccnilicr 13, 2004 <br />7:00 u’cliR'k |Mii. <br />Murpiiy slntcil in hi.s view this npplicalion sliuuld be denied tonight .iiid tliat the applicant be <br />given specific direction on what the l,5(Kt K(|tiare feel means. <br />Guflron stated if the applicant comes in with a reciiiesi for a different fimtprint and hardcover <br />variance, the Council could determine that it is a new application and the ap|)licant would not <br />need to wait the six months. CialTron notetl the new a|)plicalion would ncetl to go back before the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Peterson inquired whether the building permit would Ik held until the restoration plan is <br />implemented. <br />Uarrett stated those are two .separate issues. <br />Vogstrom staled he would be willing t<» sign an agreement saying that a certificate of occupancy <br />would not be issued until the restoration plan is approved. <br />Murphy iiujuiied what sle|>s the applicant is taking to adtiress the lost trees on the rissen property. <br />Vogstrom indicated he has spoken with the lissens a number of times and that it is hi.s <br />understanding they are agreeable with the restoratimr plan <br />Murphy moved, While seconded, lo deny Applienliun #3052, Eric Vogstrom, 2918 Casco <br />Point Koad, with the understanding that the applicant can siihmit a new application prior <br />to six months provided he is reipicsting a different hardcover variance. NO VO I E <br />1AKEN. <br />Hairetf iiu|uiied whether a 1,500 scpiare f<M)t plan would be considered a new application. <br />(iaITron staled it the applicant comes in vsilli a ievi.seil plan l)efoie December 22"^, it would Ik <br />Imnight back before the Council in January. <br />McMillan inquired why tabling is not an option. <br />IVicr.son staled the application could Ik tabled if the applicant requests it. <br />Murphy slated the applicant has indicated three linKs that be docs not wish to i.ibie it