Laserfiche WebLink
‘•si <br />I <br />tAHi&iT O <br />l>iilc Applicalion Krcrivcd: UN-IR-ril <br />Mate Appllratioii C*oiiipli*U*: 0<)<l3-04 <br />I20-I>ay Rrvkw Ikrioil F.ilcmird: 03-10-05 <br />RKQDKSI KOK COUNCIL ACTION <br />l^atc: December 7,2004 <br />Item No. <br />Dcparlmcnt Approval: <br />Name: Melanie Ciiiii.s <br />Title: City Planner <br />Adiiiiitisiralor Approval:Anemia Section: <br />Item Deiicription: <br />//04-.10.S2 - Ivrie Vof'.siroin 2618 ('aseo Point Road Varianee.s <br />ZoninR District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />l,R-IC, One l•'aInily i^akesliore Residential, 0.5 acre/IOO* <br />0.47 aLre/2().56l s.f. <br />100' parallel to the shore & 80’ (h) 75 ’ setback <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A - Rcvi.sed Plans 12-05-04 <br />B-Cotmcil Action Notice 12-02-04 <br />C - C!oimeil Menu) 11-17-04 <br />D Review Period l■xtcnsion 12-01-04 <br />I: Restoration Plan StalT Review Letter 12-08-04 <br />Application Suiiiniao': <br />riiis application was tabled at your Niivember 22"*^ meeting in older to provide the applicant with an <br />opportunity to redesign the proposal to reduce or eliminate the varianee.s requcsied. At that time <br />(.'oiincil directed the applicant to icdcsign the propo.sal to include a 1,500 s.L building footprint and the <br />appropriate hardcover to suppoi t that home. Upon receipt of this ret|uestcd plan the ('mincil would <br />determine the appropriate level of hardcover variance. <br />riic applicant has submitted a ic\ iscd plan, the luune was slightly redesigned and the applicant is now <br />proposing a .v//g/j//g le.sser variance than the 3(>.8% hardcover within the 75 ’-250' setback /one which <br />was proposed previously. I be new design is reduced from 1,884 s.f to a 1,690 s f builiting footprint <br />(including a home, 3-car attached garage, and deck) with a total of .36.0% hardcover in the 75 ’-25()’ <br />/one. 1 he new design propo.ses r»nly a 0 8% hardcover reduction from the previous propo.sal. .Staff <br />leels that the proposal is not responsive to the Councirs direction, and is resulting in e.xeessivc staff <br />time iK'ing spent on the applicalion <br />IMaiiiiiiig ('oiiimissioii Uecommeiidatioii <br />On November 15. ,’004. I’l.inning (’ommi.ssion voted 5-2 (di.s.scnting t’ommi.ssioncrs I'rit/lcr and <br />Jurgens felt additional hardcover leduclions were warranted) to recommend appn>val of a variance <br />within the 75 ’-250' /.one loi 3().8"o h.iulcovci or 2.8.’4 s f. and an average lake .selb.ick variance to <br />encroach 5 ’ into the averag.e lake sclixick in coniunciion with laiul.scape restoration plan to be <br />approved I he Planning ('ommission has not reviewed the nui.st recent submittal.