Laserfiche WebLink
Exibit G <br />Dale Application Received: 08-18-04 <br />Hale Appiicalioii Complete: 00-13-04 <br />I20-I)ay Review Period Kitended: 0.1-10-05 <br />KKQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: Jaiuiary 4, 2005 <br />Item No, <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Title: City FManner |i/iM <br />Item Description: <br />//04-3052 - F-iie Vogstrom - 2618 Casco Point Road - Variances <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />I-R-IC, One Family Lakcshorc Residential, 0.5 acrc/100’ <br />0.47 acre/20,561 s.f. <br />100’ parallel to the shore & 80’ @ 75 ’ setback <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A. Revised Survey dated 12-21 -04 <br />B. Revised Floor Plans and KIcvations <br />C. (’ouncil Memo from 12-07-04 <br />D. Draft Council Minutes from 12-07-04 <br />Application Summary: <br />This application was tabled at your December 13"' meeting in order to provide the applicant a final <br />opportunity to redesign the proposal to rcllcct a 1,500 s.f. maximum building footprint and minimal <br />associated hardcover. <br />'I'he applicant has submitted a revised plan; the footprint was reduced, one parking stall removed from <br />the plan and now the applicant is proposing a variance for 31.7% hardcover within the 75 ’-250’ <br />setback >.one. I’he new design is reduced from 1,699 s.f. to a 1,499 s.f. building footprint (including a <br />home, 2-car attached garage, and deck) with a total of 2,432 s.f or 31.7% hardcover in the 75 ’-250’ <br />zone. The lloor plans and elevation views submitted appear to match the proposed footprint on the <br />sui-vey and staff feels that this recent proposal is responsive to the Council ’s direction. <br />IManning C.’ommission Recommendation <br />On November 15, 2004, Planning (’ommission voted 5-2 (dissenting ('ommissioners Fritzlcr and <br />Jurgens lelt additional hardcover rciluctions were warranted) to recommend approval of a variance <br />within the 75 ’-250’ zone for 36.8% hardcover or 2,824 s.f and an average lake setback variance to <br />encroach 5’ into the average lake setback in conjunction with land.scape restoration plan to be <br />appiovcd. The Planning Commission has not reviewed the most recent submittal. <br />Plamiiiig Sfiiff Recomnioiidation <br />Although the majority of the Planning Commission concluded that the large 0-75 ’ area and relatively <br />.small 75 ’- 250’ area is a hardship to the property. Council should discuss the merits of this rcc|ue.st <br />and reach a conclusion as to what level of harilcover is appropriate to the site.