Laserfiche WebLink
A|i|iliCBlloii Siilmilticil: December 22,2004 <br />Incoiiiplete letter: January 4,2005 <br />A|i|illcatloii Complclc: January 10, 2005 <br />60-Day Review Ripiralioii (Site I'lan): March 11,2005 <br />120 Day Review expiration (SubtlivUioii): May 20,2005 <br />To: <br />rroiii: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />(Jhair Ralin & Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Adminislralor <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning Diiectoiy^j^j^^ <br />January 13, 2005 <br />1/05-308 1 “Stonebay LoHs*’ - Onllot E, S FONEBAY ("2670 Kelley Parkway") <br />- Public Hearing: <br />1) RPUD Amendment / Site Plan & Building Plan Approval <br />2) Final Plat Approval <br />Summary of Request New applicants request an amendment ofthc Stonebay RPUD for changes to <br />the owner-occupied coiKlominium (‘‘Lolls ’*) building and site plan, requesting final site plan and building <br />plan approvals as well as final plat approval for Outlot li as a single 2.5 acre lot for tlic condominium <br />building. With a new builder and a new architect, this new proposal is similar to the single 3-story <br />building proposal IManiiingConuni.ssionrcvicwedlastOctober.l'hesubrnitledplansidentifyfil units <br />rather than tlie 62 units originally approved. <br />Property Owner: ZB Constniction, Inc. - Arnic Zachiiian (purchase agreement with John Terrance <br />Homes LLC) <br />Planner/F^nglnccn ' Lnndfomi ----------------------- ---------------------- <br />Architect: Bruce Lchrcr <br />Staff Kccoiiimeiidatioii: <br />Planning (?ommi.s.sion .should review tlie list ofpotcntinl issues and detcnninc wI»cthcrthcsc and/or <br />additional issues raiuii c discussion. An option is to review this site plan fuilhci at your I'ebmary 2 work <br />.se.ssion. Key to your review is to detei inine whether the major levisions ai e acceptable, especially the <br />conversion from two buildings to one building . <br />IfPlanning Coinniission amcludes that the |)roj)oscd revisions are acceptable, then a recommendation <br />tor approval would be in order. If Planning Commission concludes that one or more of the topics <br />identified in this memo icquircs further considciatioii. then tabling would be appropriate.