My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
02-14-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:43:33 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ----- <br />purchasing one of these lots but noted that option may become time-consuming if there is a high amount <br />of turnover. Gsffron siated he is unsure whether the City wants to be involved in who is allowed to be a <br />tenant in tliis development once the project has been approved. <br />Fritzler commented in his view the City should not be involved in that type of review process. Fritzlcr <br />expressed a concern that if there is a high number of unoccupied buildings, the homeowner's association <br />may approve tenants that are not ideally suited for this type of development. <br />Rahn requested that the association ’s covenants be submitted to the City for review. <br />Jurgens pointed out the association ’s covenants will dictate what happens on this site in the future and <br />that the City should review that prior to final approval. <br />Bremer indicated she has a concern regarding the clear-cutting of the site and the potential that these units <br />will remain unsold for a period of time. Bremer stated she would like to sec some analysis or research <br />showing that this is a marketable concept. Bremer commented she would like to see this project be <br />successful but that she would like some reassurance that there is a market for this typo of development. <br />Mrs. Carlson stated they have looked at that issue, noting that they did look at I^ng I .akc’s <br />Comprehensive Plan and other oCtico developments along 394. Carlson indicated their last project was <br />fully leased prior to completion of construction. Carlson stated they are hopeful that this project would be <br />completed within two to three years. <br />Bremer inquired whether the buildings would be constructed separately or in groups. <br />Mr. Carlson stated they would be constructing more than one building at a time due to the shared stairwell <br />as well as to keep costs down on the project. <br />Winkey inquired whether the applicant has any marketing studies concerning this type of concept and tlie <br />viability of the project. <br />Mr. Carlson noted condominiums are a hot marketing concept at the present time in the <br />Minneapolis/St. Paul area as well as the suburbs. <br />GalTroii requested tlic Planning Commission address additional screening between the office park and the <br />residential neighborhood. Gaffron noted it is not possible to accomplish that additional screening on this
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.