My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:39:08 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTKSOFTIIE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13,2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Murphy staled in his view this application should be denied tonight and that the applicant be <br />given specific direction on what the 1,500 square feet means. <br />Gnffron stated if the applicant comes in with a request for a different footprint and hardcover <br />variance, the Council could determine that it is a new application and the applicant woidd not <br />need to wait the six months. Gaffron noted the new application would need to go back before the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Peterson inquired whether the building permit would be held until the restoration plan is <br />implemented. <br />Barrett slated those are two separate issues. <br />Vogstrom slated he would be willing to sign an agreement sayi.ig that a certificate of occupancy <br />would not be issued until the restoration plan is approved. <br />Murphy inquired what steps the applicant is taking to address the lost trees on the F.ssen property. <br />Vogstrom indicated he has spoken with the fissens a number of times and that it is his <br />understanding they arc agreeable with the restoration plan. <br />Murphy moved, White .seconded, to deny Application #.3052, Eric Vogstrom, 2018 Casco <br />Point Road, with the understanding that the applicant can submit a new application prior <br />to six months provided he is requesting a different hardcover variance. NO VOTE <br />TAKEN. <br />Barrett inquired whether a 1,500 square foot plan woidd be considered a new application. <br />Gaffron slate-J if the applicant comes in with a revised plan before December 22"^, it would be <br />brought back before the Council in January. <br />McMillan inquired why tabling is not an option. <br />Peterson stated the application could be tabled if the applicant requests it. <br />Murphy staled tlie applicjinl has indicated three times that he docs not wish to table it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.