My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:39:08 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2004 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />support of the 1,500 square foot footprint. Murphy stated in his view a great deal of research has <br />been done by the applicant and a great amount of effort has been put forth by Staff. Murphy <br />indicated in light of the research and work that has been done on this matter, the application <br />should move forward. <br />Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application be tabled. <br />Vogslrom .stated he could live with the 1,500 square feet. <br />Barbara IZsscn, 2648 Casco Point Road, stated the removal of the trees ha.*: not enhanced the view <br />of the neighborhood, noting that the trees that were removed on their lot were very mature trees <br />and cannot be replaced in their lifetime. <br />Sansevere inijuired how many trees the E.sscns lost. <br />Essen indicated they lost two mature trees. <br />Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application table. <br />Vogstrom indicated he does not want his application to be tabled. <br />McMillan stated she would like some calculations for hardcover on the 1,500 square foot <br />footprint, with the decision being up to the applicant on what size house he would like and <br />whether he would like a <br />two-stall or a three-stall garage. <br />Gaffron noted a resolution was adopted by the City listing the minimum standards for a driveway. <br />Barrett staled if the Council is going to deny the application, a denial re.solution would need to be <br />draded. <br />Peter.son noted if the application is denied, the applicant cannot submit a new application for six <br />months. <br />GalTron stated the ap|ilicant still needs some variances at 1,500 square feet. Gaffron stated the <br />denial resolution would deny the request as presently proposed and tliat if the applicant submits a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.