My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
01-24-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:39:08 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:24:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINiriKS OI<' IIIIO <br />OKONO ciTY roiJNrii, MF.F/riNr; <br />Mondiiy, IK'ci'nihcr 1.1, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock <br />exploration <»n the applicant's part. PIicIps stated lie would like the opportunity to do n further <br />detailed nnniysi.s of the two cn.sc.s citcrl in the mcmoiandnin as well as some other properties. <br />Sansevere in<|iiired whether the applicant is askinj' for his application to be tabled. <br />Phelps indicated he would like the applicant'.s application be approvetl tonipjit, hot in liijhl of <br />(SanVon's comment.s, if the (’ooncil plans to deny the application, he would like to do further <br />research. <br />Peterson iiupiired whether the applicant would like to table the application. <br />Phelps stated the applicant would like to h.ive hi.s application apjnoved fonipht, hut in the <br />alternative, to table the application to allow the applicant to resjiond tr* the comments by the C'lty <br />Planner. Phelps stated one ksue that has not been di.sciisse*l tonipht is the merits of this particular <br />application. Phelps stated the letter from Timothy Keane responds to each of ttu* hardship <br />re(|uirements set forth itl the Orono City (!<ule. Phelps statcil the discu.ssion should center on the <br />harilship crileiia outlined in M..S. 462.1.S5 and the Orono (’ity (‘ode. Phelps indicated in his <br />opinion this is a unique lot and that there are circumstances that merit the ^raiitiiif' of a variance. <br />Phelp.s indicated the applicant has lieen attempting to woik with i ic City on rievelopinp, this lot <br />and is not eircumventinp the direction of the Council. <br />Sansevere stated at the Inst meeting a c.oorl point was marie concerning haidcover in that the <br />likelihood for riinoil has been increased wit'i dit* removal of the trees. <br />Phelps mdicaterl the applicant is aprccahle to re.stoie the Vvp.ctalion on this lot. lint that in his <br />opinion it should he consuleietl as a .sepaiate issue. <br />.Sansrwere stated the lemoval ofthc trees does impact the nnudf S.in.scveic noted Council rlirl <br />not have nn o|)poituiiity to leview the letter liom the itlomey piior to tmiipht's meeting. <br />Vogstrrtm stateil he would like to get the issues resolved. <br />Peterson inquired whether the applicant would like his application tahlerl.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.