Laserfiche WebLink
^04*3016 “Creeksidc in Orono” <br />January 7,2005 <br />Page 3 <br />Tree Preservation. <br />Existing trees within the Conservation Easement Areas will be preserved. Virtually all trees will be removed <br />witltin the grading limits for road and utility construction (tliose areas inside the heavy dashed line on Sheet <br />3 of 6 of the Grading and Drainage Plans). Existing trees will generally be at risk and will probably <br />ultimately be removed in the areas between the initial grading limits and the erosion control boundaiy (the <br />heavy shaded line on Sheet 3 of 6). The applicant has agr eed to walk the site with staff prior to site <br />grading to establish which, if any, trees within the grading area can be saved or transplanted. <br />Boulevard trees will be planted every 40' along the private road as required by City Code. Also, additional <br />tree plantings will occur within the westerly 50 feet of Lots 1 and 2 in an attempt to begin re-cstablisliment <br />of the vegetated buffer in tliis area which apparently was thinned by the prior owner within the past year. <br />Tliese proposed plantings consist of 8 Norway Maples and 21 Austri an Pines, spread along a distance of <br />375'. Both species reach a mature height of50-60' and a spread averaging 30' with a moderate grow th <br />rate. Eventually, if all tlirive, these will provide an all-season screen between the new homes and the <br />existing neighboring homes to the west. <br />Staffhas indicated that the applicants must carefully follow the landscape plan general notes (upper left on <br />Sheet 12 of 1 2), especially with regards to pruning and removal of dead wood and damaged branches <br />within the Conservation Easement areas. Because this area will be owiied by a Homeowners Association, <br />and because the Easement area contains substantial areas of wooded upland, it is in the best interests of <br />the future owners and the City that the wooded Easement areas be provided with an initial ‘clean-up’ by <br />tlic developer to reduce or delay the need for Homeowners Association expenditures for tree maintenance. <br />Council should consider whether it maybe appropriate to have the Developer establish a fund or funding <br />mechanism for maintenance of the Easement areas in the Outlot, similar to that for private road <br />maintenance; and Council should consider whether additional requirements for removal of exotics <br />(Buckthorn, etc.) or some type of long-term maintenance plan/strategy should be established for the <br />easement area. Tree maintenance within the casement area is listed as an obligation of die homeowners <br />Association in the covenants, but w'ith no standards listed. <br />Conservation Easement. <br />The area subject to the Conservation Easement includes all wetlands on the property, the creek, and a <br />substantial area of upland. The Easement area is depicted and legally described in the Flow age and <br />Conservation Easement document (Exhibit E-4). Applicant has used our standard F&C Easement language <br />that primarily deals with wetlands, and has adapted it for this project. In addition to our standard limitations <br />(which appear in Exhibit E-4 as items A, C, D, E, F and G) applicant has added a prohibition on domestic <br />animals, an allowance for non-hardcover walking paths, and placement of permanent markers to denote <br />the boundaries of the Easement area as required by the City approval. <br />'Ihe casement also allows the wood creek crossing bridge to remain on the property. Furtlier, the easement <br />contains ‘hold-harmless’ language in favor ofthe City for any actions arising from the easement pro\ isions.