My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:42:50 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:23:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(12. M4-3067 LECY CONSTRUCTION ON BEHALF OF DENNIS AND AMANDA WALSH, <br />1354 REST POINT LANE, Contimi-d) <br />Sanscverc stated the City should be considering solutions that do not intrude upon the residents. <br />Mrs. Walsh noted they did suggest pavement in that area. <br />Sanscverc indicated the City should consider a solution that does not impact this property*. <br />Murphy stated it does not sound like there is a total solution to this problem unless it does not snow. <br />McMillan inquired whether there is another matcnal that could be used rather than loose gravel or <br />pavement. <br />Gappa commented snow is pushed off the roadw ay into yards m a lot of areas, with other property owners <br />also experiencing rock in their yards. Gappa stated the neighborhood parking w'as discussed but that it <br />did not appear the applicants w ere interested in having that in the agreement. <br />Mr. Walsh staled he does not have a problem w iih having the parking, but by putting in the agreement the <br />fact that this portion of the property is open to the general public raises all sorts of issues w ith liability <br />and insurance. Walsh indicated he would prefer that language not be included in the agreement. <br />Walsh stated he did discuss the public parking last time and that his neighbors do park in this area from <br />time to time. Walsh stated the parking by the neighbors was not the reason for the gravel and that the <br />gravel is there specifically for the snow*. <br />Walsh indicated they originally were willing to leave the area gravel, but after the call from the City <br />saying if an casement agreement is not entered into, the City would rescind the approval. Walsh stated he <br />took the phone call as sort of a threat. <br />Sanscverc commented the situation does appear to ha\e become somew hat confrontational. <br />White slated the idea of an easement was brought up after the applicants left the last meeting. WTiitc <br />suggcsied the parties go back to the point they were at prior to the easement being suggested. <br />Murphy stated the snow could be hauled away. <br />McMillan inquired whether the hardcover would need to be removed. <br />Walsh stated originally they w ere just going to leave it the w ay it is and just handle the snow storage on a <br />hand.sliake basis. Walsh noted Gappa had an issue with the possibility of the property being sold and the <br />future owner opposing the snow' storage. Walsh stated he then suggested he w ould be agreeable to a ten- <br />year agreement to allow the snow storage but that he would rather the area be pa\ ed. Walsh noted that is <br />w hen other issues were being brought into the easement and that he had questions whether these things <br />were applied to other people within the City. <br />WTiiic slated he is willing to go back to the agreement the City Council had with the applicants prior to <br />the request for the casement. <br />PAGE 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.