Laserfiche WebLink
m CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL <br />NO_______^04 4 <br />3. <br />5. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 16,2001 and <br />recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. <br />4. T he Plamiing Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A.The structural coverage on the lot is dencasing from 3,416 s.f. (21.8%) to <br />3,280 (20.9%). <br />B.The hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone is decreasing from 584 s.f. (8.3%) to <br />288 s.f. (4.07%). <br />C.The hardcover in tlie 75-250' setback zone is decreasing from 4,685 s.f. <br />(54.4%) to 4,501 s.f. (52.2%). <br />[).The proposed reductions in hardcover a;id structural coverage arc in addition <br />to the areas which were to be removed ay a prior owner under the terms of a <br />prior variance and which the current applicant has agreed to remove. <br />!•. The lot is extremely undersized for LR-1B. <br />F. Massing is not on issue. The garage addition is on the street side of the <br />residence and llie two adjacent properties will not be ud\ ersc'y affected by <br />the addition. <br />G. The residence was built prior to cunent zoning standards being adopted. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions e.xisting on this property arc peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would itot merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a sub.stuntial property right of the applicants; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprdiensivc Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />Page 2 of 6