My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 10:42:50 AM
Creation date
1/11/2023 10:23:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IVlINU rES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(10. #04-3060 MICHAEL DOmA EBERTZ, 1220 TONKAWA ROAD, Contimm!) <br />Curus stated in September the applicants conducted some work on their lot in an effort to stop the erosion <br />of their lakcshorc. A contractor was hired to re-grade the lake yard and install boulder rip-rap and <br />boulder rock walls without City permits or review. The applicants were notified that permits were <br />required and they have now applied for an after-the-fact hardcover variance and an aftcr-the-fact <br />conditional use permit. <br />The Planning Commission voted 5-2 on a motion to approve the after-the-fact conditional use permit and <br />deny the after-the-fact hardcover variance. The recommendation was to allow the most lakeward wall <br />with concurrent 0-75’ hardcover removals and to deny the addition of any other walls e.xccpt for those <br />determined by the Engineer to be crucial to the integrity of the lake yard. Curtis noted the City Engineer <br />has reviewed the current plan and finds it to be adequate. <br />Curtis slated the applicants have indicated that they are unable to reduce the hardcover in the 0-75' zone <br />in order to maintain the current level. Staff recommends approval of the application subject to concurrent <br />hardcover removals in the 0-75’ zone. <br />Mr. Ebeilz stated he purchased the property in 1999, with the previous owner having placed rip-rap in <br />that area. Ebertz indicated some erosion had occurred in that area and he was attempting to prevent <br />further erosion. Ebertz stated he was not aware of the need to obtain permits for this work or that <br />boulders were considered hardcover. Ebertz stated in the Y-shaped area they were going to plant some <br />hardy groundcover, noting that this area is not conducive to most vegetation. <br />Sanseverc inquired whether the applicants are agreeable with the City Engineer’s recommendations. <br />Ebertz indicated he is fine with the recommendations, but expressed a desire to possibly remodel or <br />expand the existing residence sometime in the future. Ebertz expressed a concern that this boulder wall <br />would be included as hardcover on the lot. <br />Gaff.wn stated the Council should decide whether the applicants should remove hardcover within the 0- <br />75’ zone to compensate for the new hardcover created by the boulder walls. <br />Sanseverc inquired whether rip-rap is considered hardcover. <br />Gaffron stated boulder walls arc counted as hardcover and that rip-rap is normally not allowed nowadays, <br />Gaffron stated the City has consistently considered boulder walls hardcover. <br />Sanseverc inquired whether there is any existing hardcover that could be removed. <br />Gaffron stated the stairway and deck should probably be retained, but noted there is a little shed that does <br />exist on the property that could be removed. <br />Ebertz stated a small gravel road also exists on the property. <br />Gaffron pointed out the gravel road should have been removed years ago. <br />Murphy stated the boulders are located in the Y area. <br />PAGE 12 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.