01-10-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dale A|i|ilicalion Kcceived: U8-I8-04 Date A|»|ilicalion Coiiipicic; ()*)• 1.1-04 120-Uay Kevicw I'criod Kxlcndcd: 0.1-10-05 UKQUKST FOR COIJNC:il, ACI’ION Dale; December 7, 2004 Item No. Dcpaiimcnt Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis Title: ('ily I’lumier AdminiHtrutor Approval:Agenda Section: Item Description: i/04-3052 Eric Vogstrom - 2618 (’a.sco Point Road - Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: ER-K’, One I'amily Lakesliorc Residential, 0.5 acre/100’ 0.47 acie/20,561 s.f. 100 ’ parallel to the shore & 80 ’ (a) 75’ .setback IJstorKxhibits: A -- Revi.sed Plans 12-05-04 U - Council Action Notice 12-02-04 C - Council Memo 11*17-04 D Review Period E.xlen.sion 12-01-04 R- Re.storation Plan .Stall'Review l.eller 12-08-04 Application Suiiiiiisiry: This application was tabled at yoiir November 22"** meeting in order to provide the applicant with an opportunity to redesign the pioposal to reduce or eliminate the variances rec|uesled. At that time Council directed the applicant to redesign the propo.sal to include a 1,500 .s.f. building footprint and the appropriate hardcover to supiuirt that home. Upon receipt ol this requested plan the ('ouncil would determine the appropriate level of hardcover variance. The applicant Ims submitted a revised plan; the home was slightly redesigned and the :ipplicant is now pro|K).sing a slightly le.s.ser variance than the 36.8% hardcover within the 75'-250’ .setback /one which was propo.sed previously. The new design is reduced from 1,884 s.f to a 1,600 s.f building footprint (including a home, Tear attached g.arage, and deck) with a total of 36.0% hardcover in the 75’-250’ /one. I'he new design proposes only a 0 8% hardcover reduction from the previous proj'Mi.sal. .Staff feels that the pro|>o.sal is not ic.sponsive to the Council’s direction, and is resulting in exce.ssive staff time being s|K*nt on the application. Planning < 'ummissiuii Kccoiiiiiiendalion On November 15, 2004, I'l.inning (’ommi.ssion voted 5-2 (di.s.senting (’ommissioners ITil/ler and Jurgens felt additional hardcover reductions were warranted) to recommend approval ol a variance within the 75’-25t)’ /one loi 36.8% hardcover or 2,824 s.f and an average lake .setback variance to encroach 5’ into the average lake setback in conjunction with landscape re.storation plan to be approved. The I'lanning ('ommis.sion has not reviewed the most recent submittal. C