Laserfiche WebLink
Diile A|i|>IU*ttfioii Rerdveil: 08-1B-04 <br />Iluic A|)|ilicttlioii 09-13-04 <br />120-l>»y Review IVriud Kxli'iiclccl: 03 10-05 <br />fifTrriMQ <br />JAN 1 0 2005 <br />CIIYOFOHONO <br />RK^UKST I’OR COUW’II- ACmON <br />DjiIc:Jami:;(y 4, 2005 <br />Item No. 5 <br />Dcparlmcnt Appruvul: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis <br />Tillc: City I'lanner <br />Admiiiislnilor Approval:A};i‘ii<la Section: <br />Item Description: <br />//04-.1052 liric Vogslrom - 2618 (’a.sco Point Road Vaiianee.s <br />Zoning District: <br />l.ot Area: <br />l.ot Width: <br />LR-IC, One I’amily Lakesliore Residential, 0.5 aere/lOO’ <br />0.47 acrc/20,501 s.f. <br />100 ’ parallel to the shore & 80’ (£/) 75 ’ .setback <br />I .ist of Kxhibits: <br />A. Revi.sed Survey dated 1 2-2 1 -04 <br />U. Revi.sed Floor Plans and lilevations <br />C. (’otincil Memo from 12-07-04 <br />D. Drall Council Minutes from 12-07-04 <br />Application Summary: <br />This application was tabled at your December 13"' meeting in orilcr to provide the applicant a final <br />opportunity to redesign the propo.sal to reflect u 1,500 .s.f. maximum building footprint and minimal <br />associated hardcover. <br />The applicant has submitted a revised plan; the footprint was reduced, one parking stall lemovcd fioni <br />the |)lan and now the a|)plicant is proposing a variance for 31.7% hardcover within the 75 ’-25()’ <br />setback /one. Tlie new design is reduced from 1.6W s.f. to a 1,499 s.l. building footprint (including a <br />home. 2-car attached garage, and deck) with a total of 2,432 s.f. or 31.7% hardcover in the 75 ’-250 ’ <br />/one. T!;e floor plans and elevation views submitted appear to match the propo.sed footprint on the <br />siiivey and staff feels that this recent pro|)osal is re.sponsive to the (’ouncil’s direction. <br />IMuiiiiiiig (‘oiiimi.ssioii Rcconiiiiciidutioii <br />On November 15, 2004, Planning Commi.ssion voted 5-2 (dl.s.scnting (’ommissioners Frit/.ler and <br />Juigens fell additional haidcover reductions were warranted) to iect)inmend approval of a variance <br />within the 75 ’-250 ’ /.one for 36.8% haidcover or 2,824 s.f and an average lake setback variance to <br />encroach 5 ’ into the average lake .setback in conjunction with land.scapc restoration plan to be <br />approver!. '1 he Planning Commission has not reviewed the mo.st lecenl submillal. <br />I'Iniining Mali Rcromiiicndation <br />Although the majoiily of the Planning (’oimnission concluded that the large 0-75 ’ area and relatively <br />smali /5 ’- 2.50 ’ area is a hardship to the pioperly. Council should di.scuss the merits of this request <br />and leach a conclusion as to what level of hardcover is appropriate to the site.