Laserfiche WebLink
'1J <br />•li <br />Zoning File #1618 <br />March 13, 1991 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. Lacking any clear direction in your PRD ordinance, does <br />the PRD appear consistent with other Planned Residential <br />Developments approved by the City (i.e. open space outlet, <br />configuration of pads, etc.). <br />2. What is your position on the density at three units? A <br />previous application for a three lot plat included Lot 30. <br />Review Exhibit I that depicts the 75~250 ’ building envelope. <br />3. What is the Planning Commission's position on the <br />approval of the lakeshore setback variance for building pad <br />- homesite #1? Would the three unit density be more <br />acceptable if lakeshore setback variance was not required <br />and building envelopes were more clustered within the 75- <br />250' setback area? Is that possible with Lot 30 excluded? <br />4. What is your position regarding applicant's request for <br />5,500 s.f. of hardcover for each building pad? If you <br />approve this percentage of hardcover per building site, <br />would you seek a reduction in density? <br />5. The applicant's addendum has set forth the hardships <br />very clearly for this unique property? Do you agree that <br />the property is so unique that the City would not be setting <br />a negative precedent with the approval of variances for new <br />development? With the preliminary approval of the previous <br />3 lot plat in 1982, the City approved hardcover variances <br />only for the two undeveloped lots; Lot 2 was limited to a <br />12% hardcover variance. Total hardcover at 37%. Lot 3 was <br />limited to 37% hardcover variance for total hardcover <br />percentage at 62%. <br />Lot 1 would be allowed additional hardcover within the 75- <br />250' setback area, but only if there was equal or greater <br />reductions in the existing hardcover within the 0-75' <br />setback area. <br />Planning Commission directives to applicant in the filing of <br />a formal application for a PRD/subdivision. The Planning <br />Commission is asked to provide the applicant with specific <br />direction as to what is acceptable or the degree of variance that <br />would be allowed within this PRD development. <br />1. Number of density units allowed? Approximate total or <br />gross area * 120,395 s.f. With formal application, this <br />area should be reconfirmed now that Lot 30 is no longer <br />included. Is 3 unit density more acceptable if there is no <br />encroachment of 75' setback line? <br />4 <br />lx