My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 2:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 2:13:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1629 <br />March 11, 1991 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />3. Note the following facts and figures; <br />h <br />51t- 4I)-;.:-.? <br />A. Setbacks:Existing Proposed Required <br />Front 143.2'No Change 50' min. <br />Rear 425'415'50' min. <br />Left Side 266'252'30' min. <br />Variance <br />B. Height: Although no elevation view was submitted, the <br />roof p’an indicates height will be lower than existing <br />building and less than 30' height limitation. <br />C. Footprint Area: (Lot area = 13.5 acres) <br />- Footprint per plan approved by Council <br />in Resolution #2204 <br />- Footprint as built, 1988 <br />- Footprint proposed 1991 <br />~ Allowed footprint, individual <br />accessory structure <br />12,600 s.f. <br />12,100 s.f. <br />14,090 s.f. <br />3,000 s.f. <br />D. Total of Footprint Areas: <br />Total allowed combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />Total existing combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />Total proposed combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />6,000 s.f. <br />13,828 s.f. <br />15,818 s.f. <br />The existing tennis court structure was approved by the <br />Council per Resolution #2204, adopted June 22, 1987. <br />Variances granted in that resolution include; <br />A. Exceeding 1,000 s.f. floor area (16,875 s.f. total floor <br />area, included the first and second floor). <br />B. Nearer front lot line than principal structure on <br />property. <br />C. Height of 33' defined/40' peak, exceeding 30' defined <br />height limitation. <br />Condition #2 of Resolution #2204 required that a covenant be <br />executed by the property owners, with the following <br />provisions: <br />A. No commercial use. <br />B. Adequate screening from road and neighbors. <br />C. Access from private driveway only (no new curb cut^). . <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.