My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
03-18-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 2:34:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 2:13:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1627 <br />March 12, 1991 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />C. The retaining walls will need to be modified <br />because they are already shewing signs of instability, <br />and because in some locations the overlying deck <br />structure to be removed does enhance the stability of <br />the walls because they are so high. <br />In discussions with the Engineer, staff determined that one <br />optional solution would be to lower the portions of <br />retaining walls exceeding 3-4' in height, and add additional <br />walls between the remaining walls. This would likely <br />provide the necessary stability while allowing spaces for <br />additional plantings * help screen the walls. <br />Additionally, this woo!.; ^ . minate the need for railings <br />extending upward from r sections. The storage area <br />adjacent to the main sta.yy'.y would be eliminated. The <br />final hardcover in the 0-75' after these reductions is <br />estimated at less than 4%. <br />Discussion - <br />Please review the applicant's letter of request. Applicant <br />points out five specific useful purposes for the structure as <br />built, and indicates that the topography and obvious potential <br />for bank erosion create a hardship situation that warrants the <br />variance. <br />While a number of trees tend to somewhat soften the visual <br />appearance of this structure as viewed from the Lake, there is no <br />question that this type of deck structure is in total non <br />conformity with the letter and intent of the zoning code, and <br />further, does not conform with various land use policies <br />contained in the City of Orono Community Management Plan. The <br />City of Orono has a track record of requiring pre-existing non- <br />conforming lakeshore structures to "de-intensify" or disappear as <br />they fall into disrepair, and approval of new construction and <br />hardcover of the magnitude of this structure would be unusual in <br />the 0-75* zone. <br />Additional Issues - <br />In 1983, Orono rezoned Big Island and defined "Record Lots" <br />which recognized historic patterns of use and ownership, <br />intending to keep substandard, commonly owned lots permanently in <br />common ownership. Record lot property owners were offered the <br />opportunity to be granted an "automatic lot area variance", <br />generally allowing them specific continued rights to use their <br />properties for standard single family seasonal recreational uses.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.