Laserfiche WebLink
r : <br />♦ . -» , <br />4 . <br />t <br />« • « <br />'t' <br />James A. and Patricia M. Mitchell <br />2685 {forth Shore Drive <br />yayzataf Minnesota 55391 <br />March 12, 1991 <br />•• \, .1 • • - <br />4^ _ __ <br />.'HAR i 2 .1931 <br />^ S ^ ^ ^ <br />Orono Planning Coimission <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 - - - <br />R§: §1626 - Tia and Beth Traff variance application <br />2683 North Shore Drive <br />Ladies and Gentlemen: <br />On March 18, 1991 you will be asked to consider a side yard setback <br />variance requested by Tim and Beth Traff for construction of a new <br />residence at 2683 North Shore Drive, next door to our residence at <br />2685 North Shore Drive. Since we will be out of town on March 18, <br />1991 we will be represented at the Planning Commission meeting by our <br />attorney Robert Mitchell. The purpose of this letter is to tell you <br />that we oppose your granting this variance, to point out three factu ­ <br />al inaccuracies in the Traff s' application and to explain why we <br />think the variance requested should not be granted. <br />First, the application states “both neighbors on the east and west <br />side of the house approve of our plans". Th^t is not true. Not only <br />do we not approve of the Traff s' proposed plans, we did not even see <br />the plans until after they were hied with the city. Tim mentioned <br />to us that he would be requesting a variance and told us that he <br />would ask for a letter of approval. He never, however, asked us to <br />sign such a letter. <br />The second factual inaccuracy in the application is the statement <br />that "There is no question that a new house in the middle of the <br />property and using 15-hot variances enhances the land and neighbor ­ <br />ing homes. There is no crowding or encroaching on the neighboring <br />homes," While the current small house at 2683 North Shore Drive does <br />not necessarily enhance our property, putting a different, larger (in <br />volume) house closer to ours obviously will detract from the value of <br />our property, not enhance it. <br />The third inaccuracy in the application is the suggestion that Orono <br />will cause the Traffs a hardship if Orono does not grant this vari ­ <br />ance. We are delighted that Tim and Beth are expecting a child, but <br />suggest that they could simply move into ~the-home that they ~own <br />directly across the street if space is what they desire. <br />Jn 1984 we bought one of the oldest homes in Orono. Since then we <br />have worked and studied to maintain and preserve the historic <br />eharcter and natural elegance of our home and this area. We treasure <br />Orono's rolling open spaces and wetlands and the 2-acre zoning which <br />guards the openness and the lovely views of the lake from the street <br />along the north side of Crystal Bay, . . .. . .--- <br />_ __ <br />■ -g > .♦ - -I'kAi •.kh. fkM ■■'i' if ■ i