10-21-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r ' ’G r ~rr.GN “ ASS” >*'l.r't''JN I ^4l^ ZG*4iNS •'m i C'"*- FF.O^.i Eric !>.>. KRISTAL WiLSCW F£: SsES NCRTH SnGRE DRIVE - #1626 DATE: SEPTEMBER 9. 19“1 Thank ycu for <ne?=t:ing with as earlier today and diving us same guidancs in this arccess. As ws mentianec in our meeting, wa have entered into an agreement witn Tim and Beth Traft to purchase their home at 2683 f'^orth Shore Drive, iwo are scheduled to close the sale cn CctoSer 1, 1991 and wculd like to start cons true tier, o** our heme in early NevsmOer . As you know, the Traffs were intending to build a new home on this property themselves. In anticipation of that, they applied for side sstoack, lot area and lot width variances in Marcn 1991, Qn Nay 12, 1991 the Council granted "varaiances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 <B) to allow construction of a new residence on a lot IIS' in width where 200'in width is normally required, being 1.01 acrus in area where a 2.0 acre lot a-ea is normally required, and allowing a 24.5 east side lot line setback where a 30' side setback is normally required, subject to" several conditions. We have engaoed our own architect to design a heme to meet our particular family needs. As the heme is slightly different than that which was previously submitted to the Council for variance approvals, we are taking tne initiative and asking for the Council's continued support. Enclosed please find from our architect a site plan, ficcrplan, elevation, survey and hard cover calculation. As in the previous request, we are not locking far a hard cover variance. The enclosed hard cover calculation shows we are? wi'thin all limitations* □ur particular design not dn-ly _moves the orsoosed shrugty.rf», further back ( landward ) from the previous averaoe set.hack i,no. Hi>f moves the mass of the buildinc more towards the center nf the two adjacent orocertj.es. This snouid Drov.t.g^ additional protection of the Mitchell's lakeviews. and again more than meets minimum Cl tv requirements. It should be noted 'that the two proposed encroachments over the usual 30' side setbacks are only one-story structures .* and are within the previously approved 24.5' cast side lot line setback variance^ l: 5' -* I • r4'., ■>T' m»% * • 6 • • We are excited about our project and are particularly delighted about the prospects of living in Orono,