10-21-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r 3) Project density and lot size: At first glance. 13 - one acre lots seems to be an acceptable solution compared to the previous plans that we ’ve seen (i.e. leveling off the hill and filling in the pond); however, a closer look warrants these comments: a) To build the two houses in the positions shown on the east side of Orono Orchard Road across from Orchard Drive would certainly have an adverse effect on the stream and lowlands included in these lots. Even one house would be questionable on this site due to the size of the existing knoll it would be built on and because of the driveway alignment to Orono Orchard Road. b) Two questions: Does the 2 • acre minimum lot size apply to this parcel of land? If so, would we be setting a (negative) precedent for future developments in Orono by allowing these smaller lot sizes. Additional comments and questions: a) Lots of people walk and bike along Orono Orchard Road on their way to the Luce Line Bike Trail. The sharp corner in Orono Orchard Road (where it crosses the stream) is a particularly dangerous meeting place for pedestrians and automobiles. This could be changed by adding a pathway along the east side of Orono Orchard Road beginning at Orono Oaks Drive and continuing north to Orchard Circle (or further to Bollum Lane). The stream could be crossed with a bridge (on the inside corner of the curve) to create a pleasing and safe link to the Luce Line. b) It's my understanding that the proposed road widths in this development are 30 feet curb to curb. These road widths are excessive because very few cars are parked on ine street due to the driveway lengths encouraged by a 35’ setback. I would urge you to recommend narrower street widths (approx. 24 ’) to help preserve more land. c) What Is the size of the acreage (and potential developed density) to the north of the Burlington Railroad that will be accessed by this development? d) I’ve left this comment for last because I’m almost afraid to mention it. But what the heck? I find it amazing that the City of Long Lake Is proposing this development and the south by-pass route for Highway 12 in the same breath. Who would be motivated to buy a house in this development 'viih a freeway or expressway in their backyards? Thankyou all for reading this somewhat longwinded letter. I want you to know that we are not against a residential development on this site - we request only that It be done In a manner consistent with Orono ’s high standards. We urge the members of the planning commission to table this project until It complies with those standards. Sincerely, I _________ . . .J