Laserfiche WebLink
3K"* * <br />r. <br />Zoning File #1693 <br />October 16, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />A brief review of the drainfield information indicates <br />that all sites will likely require mound systems, and <br />that there is very little flexibility in finding <br />additional septic sites or revising the locations of <br />the sites shown on most of the lots. In some cases <br />those sites meet the MPCA/DNR 10' lot line setback <br />standard, but not Orono's current 20' requirement. <br />Topography and house positioning also limit the <br />flexibility of the drainfield sites. <br />Most of the sites are shown sized for a 4-5 bedroom <br />mound system, but may not be expandable. In both Lots <br />2 and 5, there are likely to be driveway conflicts with <br />the drainfield sites. The proposed house site on Lot 2 <br />would be so restricted by the 100' shoreline setback <br />and 20' drainfield setbacks that in staff's opinion <br />this is not a reasonable lot. Lots 3, 4 and 5 are more <br />flexible. <br />Although no testing has been shown for Lot 1, the <br />existing septic system appears to be functional and <br />there appears to be substantial area available south of <br />the house for replacements. An alternate site should <br />be required to be tested as part of this subdivision. <br />The wetland in the northeast quadrant of the property <br />is about 2' above and not connected to the Tanager Lake <br />wetland. The normal 26' wetland setback for structures <br />and 75' setback for drainfields would apply. It <br />appears that the proposed roadway will encroach on the <br />26' wetland setback on both sides of the road, hence a <br />conditional use permit and variance appears to be <br />required for that road grading and filling in the <br />wetland. <br />In Lots 3 and 5, it appears possible that driveways may <br />encroach into 26' wetland setbacks, in order to avoid <br />encroaching on septic sites or lot lines. <br />Each lot contains at least 2.0 acres of contiguous dry <br />buildable land. <br />Lots 2 and 4 do not meet the 200' width standard at the <br />50’ street setback, but do meet a 200' width at the <br />proposed 100' setback from the 929.4 contour line. Lot <br />1 with the existing house, does not have 200’ at the <br />shoreline. The Orono Lake Use Committee has suggested <br />that for "lakeshore lots", setbacks be measured at the <br />shoreline and at the required lake setback line, but <br />not at the street setback line. <br />1 <br />i