Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />^ * r — If <br />igii^ <br />Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: Michael P- Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:October 16, 1991 <br />Subject: #1693 Albert D. Hanser, 1685 Fox Street - <br />Sketch Plan, 5 Lot Subdivision - Request for Variance <br />to Moratorium <br />Zoning District: RR-IB, Single family rural residential, 2 <br />acre, unsewered <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owner's List <br />Subdivision Moratorium Ordinance <br />Air Photo <br />Survey/Sketch Plan <br />Horatorium Variance Request <br />The City Council on August 26, 1991 adopted a moratorixim on <br />subdivisions within areas subject to the proposed Shoreland <br />Regulations. The intent was to eliminate the possibility of new <br />subdivisions being created under the current Code that prior to <br />actual development would become subject to new, potentially more <br />restrictive standards. <br />Section 5 of the Moratorium Ordinance indicates that the <br />Council may grant a variance if it is found that a proposal is <br />not contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, that it is <br />compatible with the proposed code amendments, that it promotes <br />the health, safety and welfare, and that a hardship would be <br />created if a variance is not granted. <br />The applicant was advised by staff to bring this forward as <br />a sketch plan rather than a full subdivision application, to <br />minimize the eunount of staff time expended on the review process <br />and delay applicant's full fee investment if a moratorium <br />variance is not forthcoming. In reviewing whether a moratorium <br />variance should be granted. Planning Commission should consider <br />the following: <br />1.Does the proposal meet the intent of the Orono <br />Comprehensive Plan for development in the rural area? <br />2.Does the proposed plan meet the standards being <br />proposed for adoption in shoreland areas? <br />3.Does the proposed subdivision promote the general <br />health, safety and welfare? <br />4 <br />■i <br />i