My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
10-21-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 2:08:46 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 1:51:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGOUVR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 <br />ZONING PILE #1586 - JAMES BDRANEN CONTINUED <br />Dlacement of the turnaround. Gerhardson stated that it would not <br />have to be cement, that a gravel surface is acceptable. Mabustn <br />addid that it would also need to be maintained in the winter. <br />SethLdson also added that it would need to be an all-weather <br />surface, not just grass. <br />Callahan responded that the general feeling of the Council <br />rotd""f,"'’ro't fa¥=e ^'^itfnT^ManT'ti-s rrScove“r <br />vMiances have been granted just so that the person will have a <br />space to turnaround safely. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, “«"^^by <br />alte^-^he-faot vtriancl "^Saiting "the double fee on the building <br />but als^requiring a turnaround to be approved by staff <br />5f sufficient size and all-weather surface to accomodate <br />limousines. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1587 RUBY SIPORD <br />96 HACKBBRRY HILL <br />AFTBR-THE-PACT VARIANCE <br />RBSOLDTION #2884 <br />Mrs. Ruby Siford was present for the review of this <br />application <br />City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed <br />after-the-fact variance regarding a ® <br />nrincinal structure and accessory structure for a deck. <br />?nspeo?«s hid nored that there^as being done <br />without a permit and put a stop work ThI <br />were out there, discussion regarding a deck took place. ine <br />contractor went ahead and built the deck without a permit after <br />be^nrtord trstop within 5«. Although the building code only <br />?eiu±res a 5' separation, the zoning code requires a 10 <br />seoaration. Given the fact that the contractor did not come in <br />for a building permit, there was no zoning ^^°^®The <br />oSner was not apprised of all of this by the contractor. The <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the 5 <br />Mabusth noted that Mrs. Siford has not <br />yet and she is asking for special consideration of the Council. .. <br />Mrs Siford stated that she and her son had discussed <br />putting a firewall in the garage and would put one in the she . jr <br />Mabusth stated that there is a shed that has not been noted
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.