Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 <br />B^lnen^ °on' t bal^ up'^'into^Le <br />yird a\°d "position the'cL%o'^ I^arpull straight ahead. In the <br />evening hours I have never had any problems. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application and <br />the Public Hearing was closed <br />, ,.v,a4. ae lono as the appUcant has indicatedCohen stated th ^ turn-around. He <br />that he has no problem, h 1 ane„ recognizes the potential <br />gon:''^o f”aV afirremove tL brush from the enh <br />of the driveway." <br />around is needed. <br />Bellows asked Kabusth whether City staff has reviewed the <br />safety aspect of this. <br />Mabusth replied, "No.” <br />Bellows suggested that the Public Works Director be asked to <br />look at irrslte^rior to Council's review of thus apolrcatron. <br />Tf v/as moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend <br />additxon to a prxn(--t' drivewav bv Citv stafr <br />^rTt^"rMr\^°"^hT^ffet^^«r-us of this condition. Motion, <br />Ayes-6. Nays-0. Motion carriec. <br />#1587 ROBY L. SIFORD <br />96 HACKBERRY HILL <br />after-the-fact variance t, m <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:17 P.M. TO 7:25 P.M. -f- ^ Mailing wereTn« Affidavit of Publication anc Certificate oi wnxxx y <br />duly noted. <br />Mrs. Siford and her son. Bill Siford. were present. <br />Mabusth suggested that Mrs. Siford be given an opportunity <br />•to explain how this situation arose. <br />Bill Siford said, "We were under <br />contractor had applied for the 1 that the City inspectorStSp^^I braid ^Sfd-rthrde^rsf t : l % e t fr m the <br />stig i\\re=VorTodry.-srr-r^ ^sirre^iid^or^^e?i“oSr ^ <br />— c - <br />1#| m “ilMi, L ^ 'ih—nr— mvt^^ ntrt—— ■■ i ■ n si -i,- - .VCV-* i i» ■ » -« HV-Wk •. k#M AiJi^T®aik riwii^ 'w J