10-21-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r b ■ Zoning File #1683 September 9, 1991 Page 3 Other Issues Whether or not Outlot A is allowed to be constructed as merely a driveway/ staff would recommend that it be given a street name and lots be assigned addresses such that no address changes would be needed upon future subdivision of the property. Both Lots 1 and 2 would be subject to the Park Fee Ordinance. This subdivision has been submitted to the Public Works Director for review by the Park Commission/ and the City Engineer for comment. There are no designated wetlands on the property. No site grading or drainage plan has been presented/ nor has a topographic survey been submitted. There is a potential for drainage from this project affecting the Hackberry Hill 1/2 acre sewered development to the east. The City Engineer advises that a topographic survey should be required now in order to adequately address the drainage concerns as well as a concept plan for the ultimate development of the property. Issues to Resolve 1.Should the existing house be forced to relocate its driveway to Outlot A? 2.Should the applicant be required at this time to construct a 24 foot paved road with 100 foot diameter cul-de-sac? 3. Have drainage concerns been adequately addressed? Staff Recommendation Given that each lot has sufficient area, width along an Outlot/ and primary and alternate drain field sites tested/ the 2-acre lot standards appear to be met. The Planning Commission must determine whether sufficient justification exists to allow Outlot A to contain merely a private driveway serving two lots at this time/ and if so, should determine what threshold of future development would trigger upgrading of that driveway to private road standards. Staff recommends that full topography of the 20-acre parcel and a concept plan and drainage plan be submitted/ and the Planning Commission may wish to table pending receipt of that'^o information. ^ '1