Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1682 <br />SeptemDer 6, 1991 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Issues t;o Consider <br />1.Is there any reasonable justification to allow a garage of <br />any size to be located 2-3' from the rear and side lot <br />lines? A garage 0-750 s.f. in area would normally require <br />10' setbacks from the side and rear lot lines for this <br />lakeshore lot. A garage 751-1000 s.f. would require 15' <br />setbacks. <br />2.Because the lot is only 0.28 acres in area, is there any <br />justification to grant a variance to allow an accessory <br />structure in excess of 1000 s.f. footprint? <br />3.Is there any justification to allow lot coverage by <br />structures to increase from 17.5% pro-existing to 19.8%, <br />when the Code only allows 15%? Does the intent to provide <br />enclosed storage for collector cars, masonary construction <br />equipment, and other items currently stored outside on the <br />property, justify the size garage proposed? Is the single <br />large garage structure more appropriate for the site than a <br />number of smaller buildings, from a visual perspective? <br />Note that the applicants propose to remove the tin shed <br />remaining on the property. <br />4.Is there any justification for approval of a hardcover <br />Increase from 46.5% (including the tin shed, old 20' x 24' <br />garage, and old 10' x 20' barn) up to 50.6% in the 75-250' <br />zone? Is there additional hardcover in the 0-75' or 75-250' <br />zones that can be removed to mitigate the additions? Note <br />that the driveway and parking area is part of a shared loop <br />driveway serving two other residences. <br />Options for Recoonnendation <br />Planning Commission might wish to consider the following <br />possible recommendations: <br />1. Denial. <br />2.Partial approval, subject to limitations on garage <br />size, location and/or concurrent hardcover removals <br />(specify those conditions). <br />3.Approval as proposed, with or without additional <br />conditions. <br />4.Table, giving applicant direction as to what type of <br />plan revisions might result in a positive <br />recommendation. <br />5.Other.oc, -Wt-?<^-C5 <br />Isv <br />t <br />/< <br />. hi r.