My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:03:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Hassel & Enlow <br />A professional association <br />FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING <br />1055 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD <br />WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 <br />TetePHONB <br />(6121 473-4402 <br />p*csiMit.e <br />16121 473-44 15 <br />June 18, 1991 <br />Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building & Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />0 <br />f <br />ff- X'^htj <br />RE: Application Number 1606 <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />- Big Island, Inc. <br />Dear Jeanne; <br />I am forwarding to you herewith a Variance Application for the <br />swimming deck/dock located on the southeasterly shoreline of the <br />property. I have attached an addendum to the Application which <br />describes unusual characteristics of the subject property for which <br />the variance is requested. <br />I have also enclosed a Application for the vacation of the 20 <br />foot wide alley which meanders across the middle of the property. <br />As yo* may recall, the updated survey reflects acreage of 5.02 <br />acres for the combined lots; however, the survey did not exclude <br />the alley. The alley serves no useful purpose for the present use <br />of the property and wt-s dedicated to serve the 14 small lots which <br />had originally been platted on the property. The vacation of the <br />alley would allow the applicant to meet the minimum acreage <br />requirement for the intended conditional use. <br />X have also enclosed a proposed special lot combination form <br />for the two parcels. Please note that I have revised the form for <br />its special application to these two lots. I believe that it still <br />meets the intent and purpose with respect to the original form. As <br />you will recall, one parcel is owned by Big Island, Inc. in fee, <br />subject to a mortgage of Donnelly Company. The other parcel is <br />being purchased on a contract for deed. Due to the status of title <br />of both properties and the encumbrance on the property with the <br />Donnelly mortgage, is not feasible at this time to legally combine <br />the lots. I have submitted the proposed special lot combination <br />form to the board of directors of Big Island, Inc. for their review <br />juid approval. <br />With respect to the checkoff list contained in the original <br />notice to the Planning Commission action sent to me on November 27, <br />1990, our response is as follows: <br />AT-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.