My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:03:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1661 <br />July 9r 1991 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />2.Although the plat maps show this total .17 acre strip as a single <br />tax parcelr a 1970 torrens action allowed the split, and <br />subsequent property owners hold deeds to their portion of the <br />strip although McCloud pays taxes on the entire strip. <br />3.As part of this subdivision request, McCloud requests that Lots <br />9, 10 and 11, Morse Island Park, and the .12 acre strip be <br />combined into a single tax parcel and be granted the Automatic <br />Lot Area Variance, which would have been afforded this record lot <br />if the subdivision had reached completion in 1985. <br />4. <br />I. ■ <br />I I f-. <br />W <br />i: <br />Although not specifically requested by Big Island Properties, the <br />City would require that the .05 acre strip be combined with <br />6, 7 and 8, Morse Island Park, and that tax parcel be combined <br />with the large inland tract through a Special Lot Combination <br />Resolution to be filed on the chain of title of both resultant <br />tax parcels. When this is completed, staff would recommend that <br />Record Lot 16 also be granted an automatic lot area variance so <br />that the property will gain the formal buildability rights <br />spelled out in the zoning code. <br />5.Upon completion of the above, staff would recommend that the City <br />proceed with an ordinance to revise Section 10.31 to designate <br />new record lots 70 and 71 for the two extraneous parcels and <br />correct any discrepancies and errors in Section 10.31 related to <br />record lot designations. <br />Staff RecGoonendation *■ <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision, subject to <br />the appropriate lot combinations occuring. Staff further recommends <br />that upon completion of the above noted combinations, the City should <br />grant "automatic lot area variances" by resolution for both Record <br />Lots 16 and 22. Note that lots 70 and 71 would be considered as <br />substandard, unbuildable record lots per Section 10.31, Subdivision 6 <br />(G), and would not qualify for the automatic lot area variance. <br />• " V >'!• <br />■ • .M <br />Note: Regarding Mr. McCloud's variance request for the <br />system, staff met with him on July 2 to discuss a redesign of the <br />structure. That plan should be back to us in time for further review <br />at your August meeting. (Staff recommends you treat this subdivision <br />as a separate issue, and note that we cannot issue building permits <br />for the property until the Subdivision and Lot Area Variance is <br />ccxnpleted.) <br />%
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.