My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
07-15-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:03:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o o <br />. > ^ <br />t • » • _ <br />CITY of ORONO <br />ri <br />• ” » <br />*N.N . <br />VN /// <br />Municipal OfHc» <br />Pf>st Office Box o6 <br />Costal Bay. Minnesou 55313 <br />June 4, 1991 <br />Bill Eockman <br />1090 Loma Linda Avenue <br />Mound, MN 55364 <br />Be: New Deck Replacing Old Three Season Porch <br />Dear Mr. BocJcman; <br />Several issues have come up in trying to get a permit issued <br />for your deck. <br />First of all, at the time of the permit for your second <br />story addition approval was given to remove the superstructure of <br />your old porch but to leave the deck in place. Mike Gaffron <br />pointed out that a variance would be required for a new deck xn <br />that location. <br />When Lyle and I visited the sight you had already torn down <br />the old porch floor and started a new deck. It appeared at first <br />that a new deck might be possible while still meeting average <br />setback distances from the lakeshore. <br />After discussing this with Mike Gaffron, we discovered that <br />your deck does indeed encroach into the average setback area. We <br />therefore suggested the deck would have to be considered a grace <br />level deck to meet setbacks. You proposed keeping the deck below <br />30" high so a railing would not be required. <br />In continuing with the zoning review we discovered that you <br />are over the 25% allowable hardcover in the 75-2S0' zone. In <br />your calculation the driveway had not been included in your total <br />Jefulr"Y to l7ke\"o"poinrtot <br />that a variance wiJ 1 be required if you wish to build a porch on <br />this deck in the future. <br />TFI FPHON'E -473.^357 • FAX-473-0510
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.