My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
06-17-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:00:01 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />i; <br />ORONO PIAiraiNG COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1604-ROOD CONTINUED <br />four feet." <br />Bellows suggested that it may be in Mr. Rood's best interest <br />to entirely forego the pi-lars. <br />Mr. Rood asked wher.der he could apply for a Variance to have <br />the pillars five feet high. <br />Kelley informed Mr. ^ <br />rK^""nan^'’fnr Cc^issicn been fairly consistent in <br />recommending that fences along public roadways be no no-e <br />3.5 feet high." <br />#1605 DR. RICHARD LINDSTROM <br />1065 WEST FERNDALE ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING and Paul Bedke^*,Charles Lindstrom, the c-tpl^canfs brother, ' <br />^rni%^1^o7e^^i^narreSns-i^ ^^tr^Vrle^-tndJ “T ^^ould <br />abstain from the discussion and voting on tnis matter. <br />Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:45 p.m. <br />raff-nn distributed a sketvck showing the revis-?d root <br />heich?r a;d floor elevatinns. He said. '•The applicants for the <br />' havp rev’’sed their olan to keep harccover ou- of the <br />0-75* ^setback area.* The only encroachment in that <br />setback \"re”a There mus\ ‘be a aV' oool* s'etb'ack from the side lot <br />!!:e aSd ! a; concern^rabout the elevation of the bcser.ent floor <br />in relation to the flood plain. <br />Mr- R.-.f^ker referred the Planning Commission to the sketch <br />tha*. Ga‘-4of had dVsVri^^ He said, "You can see that the <br />existing basement is below the flood plain elevation. 2^q <br />to construct the first level of t.ie garage at tne 932^6 <br />elevation. The second level of garage woula be at '39.11, ^hicn <br />is approximately two feet above the <br />second floor addition would even out across -ha garage a..dition <br />a^r the existing structure. We are proposing to construct a <br />Srtek‘planter, dif f el^an'ce"".(n g"arS <br />ilevation^.^"'‘The"°drive^ will slope up that additional two feet <br />along the planter up to the garage." <br />Bellows asked Mr. Bedker what the slope is coming out of the <br />lower garage. <br />Mr. Bedker replied, "We are proposing a 5% slope <br />- 10 - <br />Z•o <br />r <br />ilf' \ <br />_M
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.