My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
06-17-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 1:00:01 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:45:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1649 <br />June 13, 1991 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The proposed garage will be 45* from the neighboring <br />residence. It is interesting to note from the survey that <br />applicants' retaining walls already extend into the neighboring <br />property. While this is potentially an issue for the property <br />owners to resolve amoung themselves, it could be argued that <br />replacing the garage as proposed would perhaps limit the <br />possibilities for a future elimination of the retaining wall <br />encroachment. On the other hand, forcing the garage to meet the <br />10' setback would leave a somewhat less functional angle of <br />approach to the left garage door, and would result in the need to <br />possibly rebuild the opposite side retaining walls. <br />Applicants have not provided a garage plan. However, they <br />have stated that the garage is intended, to be a Menards or <br />similar kit garage, 20*x22', two stalls, standard 8' walls with a <br />4:12 pitched roof, and peak height of approximately 12'. In the <br />context of the proposed location, this garage probably will not <br />have a significant visual luipact on the neighborhood. <br />Staff Recoamendation - <br />If Planning Commission feels that applicants have provided <br />sufficient hardships and justification for granting of the 5.5' <br />side setback variance, then a recommendation for approval would <br />be appropriate. Likewise, if Planning Commission determines that <br />the proposed removals of hardcover are acceptable, then a similar <br />recommendation for approval would be appropriate.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.