Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
.w <br />u.- >• <br />43091.2 <br />TO:Chair Charles Kelley <br />Planning Commission Members <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat <br />April 30, 1991 <br />i)!J% <br />SUBJECT: Facility/Site Recommendation <br />Attachment:A. Facility Committee Recommendation <br />B. Financial Site Comparison <br />C. Minutes of Facilities Committee meeting 4/4/91 <br />D. Minutes of Facilities Committee meeting 4/29/91 <br />E. Information Presented by John Farnham to Council <br />- 4/22/91 <br />F. EOS Letter Dated 2/24/91 <br />G. Information Prepared by John Farnham Regarding <br />Response to Facility Committee Draft/Undated <br />H. Financing Survey of Public Facilities/Boarman <br />1. Hold a public hearing related to a facility site. <br />2. Develop a recommendation for Council regarding site selection <br />INTRODUCTION - At a joint meeting of the Council/Planning <br />nn and Facilities Committee on April 4, 1991 the Council <br />request d that both the Facilities Committee and the Planning <br />Commission develop recommendations for it that would then be <br />taken to the Council's May 13, 1991 meeting for a decision on a <br />site. The Facilities Committee met on April 29, 1991 and <br />Attachment A represents their recommendation. <br />DISCUSSION - The Facilities Committee <br />s^^mmary of their verbal recommendation to <br />was the Highway 12 site on which the <br />option. The Committee further indicated <br />of Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road <br />alternative, except for the cost that <br />eminent domaine acquisition. <br />recommendation was a <br />Council last fall which <br />City currently has an <br />the southwest quadrant <br />as being an acceptable <br />might be entailed in <br />At the Council's April 22, 1991 meeting Mr. Farnham presented <br />Attachment F, outlining information he felt that was not available <br />to Planning Commission and Council and that if made available <br />would result in a different recommendation. The principal thrust <br />of this together with Attachment G is that Mr. Farnham feels that <br />the facilities can be downsized to the point that they could fit <br />on existing property within the Crystal Bay neighborhood. (It is <br />suggested that the size of the facility should be reduced by <br />about 40 or 50% from the "prototypes" that has been worked with.) <br />Attachment F represents Mr. Zack Johnson's response to part of <br />the information in Attachment E. Attachment H represents a <br />broader scope of information as it relates to various financing