04-15-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

mi • 4- Zoning File #1636 April Hr 1991 Page 4 of 5 2. Excessive hardcover within the 72-250* setback area. The existing paved drive brings the property up to 37.4% hardcover. Review staff's sketch (Exhibit M). Staff has sketched in areas of drive that could be removed and still function resulting in a reduction of 600 s.f. or 4.4% hardcover. Note also that there is a landscape area under lain with plastic at 115.5 s.f. or .85%. Can the same findings be made for the current hardcover variance application as was made in the variance application of 1986 (review Exhibit 0)? Please be prepared to respond to this issue. 3. Issue of deck constructed without building permit authority. In 1985/86 deck would have been approved at 3.1* setback. Would such action have been in conflict with intent of Resolution #1718-B? The decks would not have created hardcover excesses because porous blocks were to be used for drive (hardcover was at 19%). Both decks would not have required other setback variance. Options of Action -^ . • Denial. Please refer to the necessary findings section in your zoning code; or ^ Approval as proposed and require applicant to obtain necessary building permits to cover lakeside and street-side decks. Building permit to include penalty fee. y I Conditional approval of application as proposed subjectyto applicant obtaining building permit for lakeside and street side deckSr to include penalty fee, and the granting of a hardcover variance of % and a setback variance of 'or % for street deck based on one or more of the following: 1. Approval or disapproval of lakeside deck as built 2. Approval of street-side deck: A. at current location; or m B. to be alterated to meet 10' setback; C. other. : - I •3. Excessive hardcover at 37.4%. 1 r ^ "-- -- ,