04-15-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f r.-,*.. Zoning File #1636 April Hr 1991 Page 2 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D1 Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K1 Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Application Property Owners List Plat Map 3 - Resolution #1718-B, Approved 1/14/85 • Permit #5678r Issued 7/12/85 Hardcover Fact Sheet Submitted w/Building Permit Survey Submitted w/Building Permit Surveyor's Letter of 3/14/91 Hardcover Fact Sheet Hardcover Site Plan 2 - Floor Plan/Elevation - Street Side Deck Floor Plan - Lakeside Area Staff Site Plan Elevation 2nd Floor Lakeside Deck Resolution #1908, Approved 1/86 Review of J^pplicatlon ** Although a building permit was issued in 1985 for the proposed addition to the existing residence on the.property, applicant has only recently applied for a certificate of occupancy. In the process of making the final inspection, the Building staff noted variations from the approvals granted for the development of this property in Resolution #1718-B ^(Exhibit D1 through D3). The applicant was advised that he had obvious hardcover problems and that applicant had constructed a deck along the north side of the lot line where the above referenced resoluton would have prohibited expansion. It was staff's understanding that all new construction at that portion of the property would have to meet the required 10' setback. The applicant claimed to be confussed because it was .his understanding that he was only at 19% and the property'was approved for 25%. Please review Exhibit F, the hardcover fact sheet that was submitted with the building permit. The 1985 building permit covered a 2-story 22'x49' addition to the south side of the structure that included an 8>i'x6' second floor deck. The permit was issued based on the use of porous blocks for the driveway. Review Exhibit N, note the building permit did include the second floor lakeside deck. Review Exhibits K1 through 2 and L, the lakeside deck at 102 s.f. and the street side deck at 154.7 s.f. were not shown on the building plans. Note also that the floor plans in the dinette area showed windows and not doors. Doors were also not shown within the existing living room area. The lakeshore deck does not encroach the 75* setback line nor an average lakeshore setback line (Exhibit M). The structure would not have required a hardcover variance at the time of the issuance of a building permit even if they were included because the driveway was to be at a 635 s.f. hardcover. J