02-19-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Existing Hardcover = 5,093 s.f. or 30.4%*^ Proposed Hardcover = 5,392 s.f. or 32.2% increase of 299.2 s.f. or 1.79%*^ House *= 1,376 + 145 s.f. =* 1,521 s.f. Garage = 612 s.f. Drive = 1,058 + 1,260 = 2,318 s.f. Former Deck => 280 s.f. Deck Steps = 52 s.f. Front Steps = 42 s.f. Landscape Area = 84 + 112 + 72 =* 268 s.f. Eaves at 4' width above proposed deck not included in hardcover calculation as City has never made final determination for eaves in excess of l*j' width. The second story deck (4'x48.8') = 195.2 s.f. The new deck (12'x32*) results in a net increase of 104 s.f. of hardcover. Please review Exhibits D1 through D2. The applicant's written comments will help to provide Members with background on the after-the-fact aspect of chis application. As with many penalty applications, the owner is left to resolve the unfortunate actions of a contractor. Review Exhibits G and H, the original lC'x2S' ^ieck recorded in the assessor's records and the real estate photo of the lakeside of the house confirm the existence of the deck at approximately 10'x28*. Note the 1971 date of the assessor's records confirms that the deck was constructed prior to the laJceshore regulations of the City. The deck was replaced with a new deck measuring 12'x32'. All but 3 of the footings are considered new construction. In reviewing aerial maps of the area and upon a site inspection, there appears to be no problem with an average lakeshore setback. The second phase of this application involves the applicant's request for a second story deck or catwalk along the east side of the residence. The catwalk deck would link to the second story lakeside deck providing a secondary access from the rear second story bedroom (review Exhibit J). Applicant is concerned that if fire comes up the centrally located staircase, the only available egress from the second floor rear bedroom is at the patio doors leading to lakeside deck. As already noted in the factual findings, the 4 ’ overhang has not been included in the hardcover calculations. The 4' deck/catwalk would result in 195.2 s.f. of additional hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. The comprehensive variance application would ask for approval of an increase of 299.2 s.f. or 1.79% of additional hardcover (104 net increase for new deck, 195.2 for proposed second story deck). --------------------------1^1111 I ai k.