02-19-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

l'\w PlaoDJig Conunission Chairman Kelley Orow Planning Commission Members CitjAdministrator Bernhardson I- Frcm: Date: Mictael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Febnary 14, 1991 Subject: #16]1 Mark & Tracy Whitehead, 1220 Lyman Avenue - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning Distifct - RR-IB, Single family rural residential, unsewerei 2 acre minimum. Application -Four lot subdivision to create three additional building iltes. List of Bzhib^ Exhibit A- Exhibit B- Exhibit C- Exhibit D- Exhibit K- Exhibit P- Exhibit G- Exhibit H- Application Plat Map Property Owners List Proposed Plat Drawings Staff Sketch Plan Memo 1/16/91 Notice of Planning Commission Action 1/25/91 Selected Comprehensive Plan & Subdivision Code Sections Staff Sketches - Road Options/Septic Layout/ Steep Slopes Pertinent Facts - 1. Proposed lot area data is as follows: Dry Wetland Total Lot 1 2.0 ac 1.9 ac 3.9 ac Lot I 2.0 0.3 2.3 Lot 3 (w/house)2.3 0.3 2.6 Lot «2.0 —2.0 Outist A 0.22 -0.22 Outlst B 0.33 —0.33 8.85 ac.2.5 ac.11.35 ac At the sistch plan review, it was the clear intent of the Planning fonmission that Lyman Avenue be upgraded as part of this subftvlsion, because this development will increase traffic ■ an already substandard roadway. Code Section 11.32, StMivision 1 requires that the subdivider at his expense ijprove the public and private roadway to a standard acceptabBft to the City. However, the issue as to how far east this developer should be responsible for, is not defined Iscause the developer does not own the property where hisdriveway accesses the existing private easement road. The question is, if the City requires this developer to provUb a cul-de-sac (which is definitely needed for maintenaace purposes) should it be dedicated from within this plalk or fr^n neighboring properties to the east? i