My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
02-19-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 12:21:41 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:03:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br />ZONING PILE NO. 1617 <br />CITY OP ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bayr MN 55323 <br />NOTICE OP PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />473-7357 Date of Notice: 1/25/91 <br />TO:Tracy & G. Marc Whitehead <br />1220 Lyman Avenue <br />Wayzatar MN 55391 <br />COPIES TO: <br />TYPE OP APPLICATION: Subdivision (Sketch Plan Review) <br />DATE OP MEETING: 1/22/91 VOTE: - For - Against <br />Planning Coaaission recommends the following: <br />No action required <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />Planning Commission reached a concensus on few issues related to this <br />plat. However, the general feeling was that this subdivision creates <br />?rt'h% \‘'p%^^c^nt°s•%;pere!" i^'-n^l^o'^e S^on <br />11.32, Subdivision 1 (A) provides for this improvement. There was no <br />strong concensus on whether such upgraded portions should then e <br />maintained by the City. <br />Planning Commission left open the question of whether Outlot B should <br />be allowed as a shared driveway for 2 lots only, or whether it must be <br />expanded and constructed to City private road standards. <br />Technically, if Lots 3 or 4 were to also use Outlot B, the 3rd user <br />triggers the need for a road upgrade to private road standards, i.e. a 50 <br />outlot with 24* paved road, and 80’ diameter paved cul-de-sac (Section <br />11.33, Subdivision 4). Outlot B as proposed could be allowed only if it is <br />restricted so that Lots 3 and 4 can’t ever use it. Your case for leaving <br />Outlot B as a 30’ driveway outlot serving only Lots 2 and 3, rests on <br />finding a suitable access directly to Lyman Avenue for Lot 4, maintaining <br />your existing access for Lot 3, and upgrading portions of Lyman Avenue in <br />or adjacent to your property to the 28’ paved width required for more an <br />6 users. <br />Planning Commission did not discuss the orientation of building <br />envelopes proposed for each lot. <br />As we discussed at the meeting, your next step should be to make a <br />formal plat application. <br />If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission <br />minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval <br />by the Planning Commission. <br />Please call City staff if you have questions
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.