My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
02-19-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 12:21:41 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:03:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hxhotbs of ths FuumxiiG coioassioii kbstihg hbld JULY la# laaa <br />SONIKG AMEHDMBNT-SICNAGE - CONTIMOEO ... . ^residential areas and the amount of time -temporary" algne may <br />hilaved, ^e problem aigna are those that are allowed by Conditional <br />Ose Peral^on public right-of-waya, together with •i9na in residential.?r.r” ncitlSn. b.m« uum^l cr«.«i.ny. The <br />th. ordln.ne. 1. to .llnin.t. onooln. tenporory .Ign.. <br />nreaentlv let their permit lapse and then apply to renew again and <br />?f!I!Ion asked whether this aff^ed garage sale signs. Mabuath stated that <br />it would if thoae signs were located in a right-of-way. The recoimendation <br />is ^ add language to the existing signage Ordinance, sub-paragraph A <br />■tatlng that no conditional uae permit will be issued by the Council if <br />such a^permit or temporary permit has been issued in the previous 24 <br />annths. <br />Mr. John Hollander asked about enforcing ordinance and whether jwblic <br />rioht-of-way pertained to County Hoads or Orono City Roads. He11c/ <br />responded by saying public right-of-way means County, Cl^, <br />Mabu^ stated List illegal aigna on County Roads would be picked up by the <br />County# etc. <br />JrellSus 24^months and that no such signs be allowed in residential tones. <br />permit reqniresMnts could not be renewed indefinitely. <br />It was moved by Johnson# seconded by Moos# to recommend adoption of <br />the Ordlnauce nmondment to 10.61 sub-division lA and IH. Motion# Ayes*®# <br />Rays-0# y.otion passed. <br />B A1 <br />nmuc ■ <br />tT - IBCX8 <br />This pertains to language regarding an ordinance to amend the <br />height regulations and clarify the wording of the non —encroachment section <br />of the toning code. <br />longer aggravate an existing condition. <br />Saffron said the next change would involve the <br />encroachment which was a separate issue and Z®*,*** J iSiiiiM-MrampH B. Sub-paragraph C# naa»-plata aigna for ona faaily dwalllnga <br />MS listed along with the ordinance pertaining to lighta. Lights should be <br />f .idsygr <br />f <br />\ <br />a <br />Vs <br />•> <br />t.: <br />* I <br />##. • <br />t! <br />f <br />. 4 <br />*•1 <br />f <br />5 <br />« r <br />f. <br />ir. <br />} <br />}l <br />••J <br />a* ■, <br />t ' <br />I p# V/• • a <br />.V- <br />■1 ■ • <br />iiiMifti-hm-iiv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.