Laserfiche WebLink
Lakeshore Lot Standards <br />December 6, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />What is City's Goal? <br />Planning Commission should define your goals for development <br />of lakeshore property: <br />A. One perceived goal may be to limit the congestion of <br />docks and lake oriented structures at the shoreIxne, and to <br />maximize the area of the 75' protected zone. Thxs has been <br />the historical position of the City, although the lack of a <br />clear definition has resulted in a number of disputes. With <br />this goal in mind, you would define the required lot width <br />at the shoreline and perhaps at the 75' setback line. <br />B. If your goal is maximize the number of lots with <br />lakeshore access, then you would <br />a^ l^^sser^standard or no standard for lot width at the <br />shoreline. <br />Exhibits C are a series of sketches. Sketch C-1 is a <br />items which are technically nc—encroachments in a rear ya^rd, <br />which you would not necessarily want to see in the street yard or <br />a lakeshore lot.) <br />Sketch C-2 indicates the 4 obvious lines at which lot width <br />Wording of <br />the definition of lot width, the proposed subdivision into two <br />1/2 acre lots might or might not be approved. <br />Exhibits C-3 through C-10 depict a mythical lakeshore Parcel <br />in the 1/2 acre zone and the various lot configurations that <br />in use. <br />Reccsmiexuletiioii *Exhibit A provides draft wording options for the various <br />measuring point definitions you may wish to consider. <br />Also, does Planning Comiv-.V?'.’*n wish to consider redefining <br />lakeshore lots as having some^, other than a rear yard? Thi <br />definition has created much Cwa.?’ i ion when <br />rear yard non-encroachments to the street yard of lakeshore lots. <br />1 <br />A