My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-1991 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1991
>
01-22-1991 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 12:22:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2022 12:02:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 20, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1473/|1570-DC^raEY CONTINUED <br />for runoff to go other than Mr. Downey's property <br />Mabusth replied, "V7ater has always drained down to Mr. <br />Downey's property." <br />Mr. Downey disagreed. He said, "The neighbor brought in a <br />tremendous amount of fill. There was drainage onco my property, <br />but it was not as severe as it is now since the retaining walls <br />were removed. I knov/ Maureen was out to look at the property. <br />Does the Planning Commission believe there is drainage coming <br />from the neighbor's property?" <br />Rowlette replied, "There is no doubt about it. You can see <br />evidence of where the water is draining and there are exposed <br />tree roots." <br />The other Planning Commissi:5n members concurred. <br />Bellows said, "I am concerned about Mr. Downey's proposal to <br />j^QSolve the problem. I do not see chat v/hat is proposed well fix <br />the area that has had the moft severe erosion. The area by the <br />stone path, as you are approaching the deck, is very unstable. I <br />agree that something needs to be done, but this plan will not <br />accomplish v;hat you are trying to achieve." <br />Bellows referred to thv. letter from the City Engineer. She <br />said, "It is Glenn Cook's opinion that the retaining wall planned <br />is in excess of what is necessary for bank stabilication. He is <br />calling for a retaining wall along the east side of the boat <br />house. However, he is not in favor of the other v/alls as shown." <br />Mr. Downey replied, "I in trying to save as much money as <br />possible and am, therefore, receptive to the City Engineer's <br />comments. I would be happy to cut back the size of the v/all. My <br />biggest concern is the boat house. I’m afraid that erosion will <br />move the boat house out of its present locatron." <br />Dcll'^ws asked Mr. Downey how the boat house is currently <br />being used. <br />^ -M. Mr. Downey replied, "It is being used as a reci’tctional area <br />for my children and for a place to store v/ater skis, etc." <br />Hanson said, "I am in agreem<*;,c that some form of retailing <br />walls are necessary to deal with erosion, particularly at the <br />east wall of the boat house I concur with Maureen that the area <br />near the deck needs attercion. However, I also agree with the <br />cemiuents from the City Engineer. I would suggest that Mr. Downey <br />get another assessment for resolving the problem from another <br />source. We could table this application for another month." <br />- 5 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.