Laserfiche WebLink
r ir-- T^ <br />W'^--ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 <br />COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE'S COMMENTS CONTINUED <br />me tend to doubt Council’s sincerity. I think the Planning <br />Commission needs to sit down and determine among ourselves what <br />we want our role to be. If we think anything is going to change, <br />then we need to take a direct leadership role in doing that." <br />r < <br />Councilmember Jabbour explained to the Planning Commission <br />that the concerns the Mayor has regarding the City of Long Lake s <br />sensitivity to the word "merger" or "consolidation" is well <br />founded. He told the Planning Commission that Councilmembers, <br />and Planning Commission Chair Kelley had met with the Long Lake <br />City officials to discuss this matter. He said, 'One of the <br />problems is that the Wayzata Newspaper printed an <br />indicating that the action taken by Council at their March .-5th <br />meeting was as Mayor Peterson had thought it to be. The other <br />paper reported that the action taken was as Councilmember Butler <br />indicated. The City of Long Lake got mixed messages on both <br />ends. The City Administrator, who was on vacation immediately <br />following the meeting, also understood the motion as Mayor <br />Peterson had. There was a true misunderstanding of the motion. <br />The City of Long Lake is very sensitive to issues, and not only <br />this one. Last week Council met again with representatives from <br />the City of Long Lake. Sherokee Use and Bruce Carlson were also <br />there. The first thing I told the people from Long Lake was that <br />they would be receiving a letter from the City of Orono <br />indicating that the consolidation paragraph would be included in <br />our adopted position on Highway 12. The Mayor from Long Lake <br />said, 'Than there is nothing for us to ever talk about again . <br />We tried to get the Long Lake City officials beyond that way of <br />thinking so that we could discuss the issue of Highway a2. <br />However, we could not get past the word ’merger*. We spent hours <br />and hours arguing and d:.d not gat anywhere. I think <br />Councilmember Goetten was correct when she suggested that we <br />avoid that issue in our position." <br />Bellows clarified that her comments pertaining to Council's <br />sincerity did not just apply to Highway 12, but to the manner in <br />which Council communicates with members of the City. She said, <br />"Specifically there have been some issues involving appointments <br />or ra-appointments, that have not been addressed properly. <br />Communication has got to be improved. I applaud the efforts of <br />Councilmember Jabbour, who is working overtime to try and make <br />things work." <br />(«13)APPROVAL OP MINUTES <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Kelley, to approve the <br />minutes of the March 18, 1991, and March 20, 1991, Planning <br />Commission meetings. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0. Cohen, Moos, and <br />Johnson abstained. <br />- 16 - <br />t Air-; '■ <br />1 <br />'.•■•i ' T , V iii-if I rritar iitiai tt,