Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />if?-.' <br />P‘,..,>a'i <br />if’.'lA; • <br />ir'':m <br />b ■ ■ <br />t. : ■ ■•[. A * JL( . ■ <br />hm:Ak - <br />■#4' <br />■ <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 <br />(#9)ZONING FILE #1638-CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED <br />additional question. M'orse asked if the City will in fact remove <br />this structure if a City facility is constructed elsewhere. <br />Mabusth stated that the City definitely will remove the structure <br />and that it will serve as a storage facility for sand and salt. <br />Bellows amended her motion to state additionally that the <br />structure is temporary. Cohen seconded the amendment. All voted <br />aye. Motion carried. <br />(#10)ZONING FILE #1618-HILLIAM PUCEL <br />BALDUR PARK <br />PRO/SUBDIVISION-SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />Mr. Pucel asked Mabusth if she would review his sketch plan <br />again for the benefit of the Planning Commission members not <br />present at the March 18, or March 20 Planning Commission meeting. <br />Mabusth displayed Mr. Pucel's sketch plan and briefly <br />explained his proposal. She also showed the Planning Commission <br />the three-lot subdivision proposed for this property by Marco <br />Franklin. Mabusth noted that Mr. Franklin's proposal did not <br />include any encroachment of the 75 foot setback area, that it did <br />not require any setback Variances, and had smaller house pads. <br />The grading plan did not include any grading within the 0-75' <br />setback area. The issues involved with hardcover and the road <br />would have needed to be addressed. <br />Cohen said, "In my opinion, this property will not support <br />three units, it will support one house." <br />Mr. Pucel askad what other issues the Planning Commission <br />would like him to address other than the road. He stated that he <br />did not feel he had received sufficient direction from the <br />Planning Commission on what he could do to develop this property. <br />Johnson questioned whether Mr. Pucel was planning the same <br />stormwater treatment and grading plans as those submitted by <br />Marco Franklin. He stated that even though this is a sketch <br />plan, Mr. Pucel has not provided enough information to enable him <br />to determine the other issues that need to be addressed. Johnson <br />did agree that a PRD is the way this parcel needs to be <br />developed, but could not state whether or not he would approve <br />any Variances. <br />Mr. Pucel replied, "The road would sixteen feet and there <br />would be a drainage area that would flow into a holding pond. <br />There would not be any grading as we would build on site without <br />having a change in the topography. The sewer would have to be <br />installed along the south side. Before I invest more expense <br />into this, I want to be sure I am going in the right direction." <br />^Bellows stated that she would not bt3 in favor of <br />recommending approval of Variances to create a PRD on this site. <br />- 13 - <br />Wt.' <br />■: . V' •4-;*::^