My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
03-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 11:58:26 AM
Creation date
12/14/2022 11:57:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991 <br />(#8)ZONING FILE 11626-TRAFF CONTINUED <br />oossible to take t‘ne most advantage of tne recreational# <br />and arL variance because the hardship runs with the land because <br />the cTty recognized the lot as buildable, and it is sewered. <br />HaLon agreed. Motion, Ayes-3. Kelley, Nay. Motion carried. <br />(#9)ZONING FILE #1627-SAM MCCLOUD <br />application #1627, as requested by the applicant. Motion, <br />Ayes-4, Nays-0. Motion carried. <br />(#10)ZONING FILE #1628-SARA ft MARK FINNEY <br />4195 HIGHffOOO ROAD <br />VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Sara Finney was present. <br />Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing at 4:36 p.m., and <br />reviewed the Planning Commission's views regarding this <br />application and the intent of the average lakeshore setback. <br />lakeshorrstruc\®ure^^co^^ of^reLi^ning walls, and a stairway. <br />Mabusth replied, "We were unable to meet Sara o.n-site, but <br />did have an opportunity to discuss the structure with her. T lere <br />i3 a deck which would appear to not meat the City s jafct <br />landing standards. The structure is approximately eight to ten <br />years old. It may be appropriate for tha Planning Commission to <br />include in their recommendation a statement pertaining to this <br />structure being recognized as a non-conforming structure. <br />City cannot guarantee that the applicants will be a ow <br />rebuild the deck at such time that it deteriorates, and any <br />structural repairs that are deemed necessary will have to fa- <br />approved by the City." <br />Hanson was concerned about treating this non-conforming <br />structure in a manner different than the way such structures are <br />normally addressed, though he fully understood the innocence o. <br />the Finney's and the owners of the property prior to them. <br />Bellows asked what measures the City w.ill take to assure <br />that the Finney's and any other owners of this property <br />understand the restrictions regarding the lakeshore structure. <br />Mabusth stated that the resolution would include language <br />mm <br />- 5 - <br />i <br />m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.