My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
02-20-1991 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2022 11:56:49 AM
Creation date
12/14/2022 11:55:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tv <br />PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 20, 1991 <br />first." <br />Jabbour said, "It was either the 5th or 6th of January that <br />Lonq Lake asked us to meet with them regarding the police issue. <br />To the best of my recollection, that is the first meeting that <br />has taken place where our entire Council met with their entire <br />Council. That is a major step forv/ard. It might seem like a <br />minor issue, but prior to that, those two Councils could not even <br />sit in the same room together. I do not understand why Orono and <br />Long Lake are two cities, but that is how it is. Both cities <br />have issues that need to be addressed and they extend beyond the <br />issue of giving them a small parcel of land. We are now in <br />litigation with them trying to preserve part of Orono the way we <br />would like to see it developed. It is not necessarily the tax <br />issue that was most important to Orono. At the meeting, I asked <br />the Long Lake Council if we could talk about annexation.- Highway <br />12 and they vowed to be cooperative. So far we have not gotten <br />over the hurdle of annexation. Tomorrow there will be a meeting <br />in that regard with the Municipal Board. Until we get over that <br />hurdle, I do not think the dialogue has been very good. <br />Ms. Schmidt suggested it may be appropriate to table the <br />annexation issue to clear the way for discussion on Highway x2. <br />Jabbour stated that there is a time limit on the annexation <br />issue. He said, "It is more complicated than it sounds." <br />Another resident asked if the rest of the Planning <br />Commission would answer Sherokee Use’s question about the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Moos stated that she supports the Comprehensive Plan and <br />that in her opinion, the new highway should be located on an <br />existing corridor. She said, "Highway 55 would be great-- <br />it moves it north. However, I also think that something must be <br />done to Highway 12." <br />A member of the audience asked how the Planning Commission <br />sees the extent of upgrade needed. <br />Cohen said, "Most of us feel that it is not going to be a <br />freeway. We would not stand for a freeway. Secondly, widening <br />is necessary, but should be done as minimally as possible with <br />maximum safety." <br />Kelley said, "I view the process through which we are <br />as a means of providing us with your input. We will meet <br />week to discuss the i:^sue among ourselves and take <br />consideration what v/e have hea.rd frcjm you and learned <br />attending Highway 12 meetings. Tne Planning Commission is <br />to make a recommendation to the City Council as to where we <br />Highway 12 should go, and possibly some vague recommendation <br />going <br />next <br />into <br />from <br />going <br />think <br />- 16 - <br />n <br />4 <br />*
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.